Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Religion & Law Blogs -> Mirror of Justice
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Religion & Law
: Mirror of JusticeA Supreme Court without Protestants?
I have an op-ed in today's "weekend" edition of the Wall Street Journal called "The Minority Court" (I didn't pick the title). Here's a bit . . .
Those who founded our nation would certainly have been surprised by much of what goes on now at the Supreme Court?free-speech cases about online child pornography, search-and-seizure disputes involving thermal-imaging devices, and so on. Even more surprising to them than the Court's work, though, would have been the Court's current makeup. Its nine members include two Jews and six Roman Catholics. And Justice John Paul Stevens, the Court's lone Protestant member, recently announced his plans to step down. . . .
Certainly, the Court's current lineup confirms the long distance traveled since crude and bizarre anti-Catholic polemics and conspiracy theories helped to sink the 1928 presidential campaign of Al Smith, or the days when the unabashedly anti-Semitic Justice James McReynolds refused to speak to his Jewish colleague, Justice Brandeis. More curious than the increasing numbers of Catholics and Jews on the Court is the possible disappearance of Protestants. Diminishing prejudice helps to account for why a country that is 2% Jewish has a Supreme Court with two Jewish justices, but it would not seem to explain why the Court of a nation that is half-Protestant might soon have no Protestants. . . .
Whatever the explanation for the Court's current religious makeup, and for the possible (though certainly temporary) absence of Protestant justices, it should be remembered and emphasized that all judges?Protestants, Catholics, Jews and all the rest?have views, commitments and experiences that shape their thinking and understanding. We should not ask or expect judges to put all this aside when they put on their judicial robes. Instead, we should ask and expect them to work conscientiously in every case to identify not their own preferred outcome but, to the extent possible, the answer that is given by the best reading of relevant legal texts, rules and precedents.
Full post as published by Mirror of Justice on April 17, 2010 (boomark / email).
Selection of State Supreme Court Judges
How State Court Judges are Selected
California Supreme Court Proposition 8 Decision
Court Rejects Challenges to Proposition 8, but Finds Marriages Valid
Is Barack Obama a Natural Born Citizen?
Wrotnowski v. Bysiewicz (Supreme Court): Does Obama meet the constitutional requirements to be President
Unwed Fathers' Rights in Adoption
Landmark Cases in Adoption Law Shape Law with respect to Unwed Fathers
Law Enforcement and Criminal Justice Career Choices
Descriptions of law enforcement occupations
Heart of Atlanta v United States
Supreme Court Decision: Civil Rights Act Protected by Interstate Commerce Clause
Ebay Fined
French Court Sets Fine at $61 Million
Personal Injury
Appeals Court Upholds Congressional Legislation
Tomato Salmonella
Sheetz Convenience Stores agrees to confidential out-of-court settlement with food poisoning victim.
National Association of Realtors
Settlement reached in broker listing antitrust lawsuit, pending court approval.
Missouri Attorney General's Office
$26,000 settlement reached in disability discrimination lawsuit, pending court approval.
Rutland School District
Double pay offered as part of class action wage dispute settlement, pending court approval.

America, 2010: Protestants underrepresented at the U.S. Supreme Court
Religion, politics shape black views on gay issues
A Supreme Court without Protestants
Supreme Court may soon lack Protestant justices
Special Anglo-Nantucket-Bow Tie Alert.








