ADVERTISEMENT



Google       

Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Federal Judiciary Blogs -> Second Circuit Sentencing Blog

OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense

Find a Local Lawyer

Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402

Bookmark

Federal Judiciary

: Second Circuit Sentencing Blog

Second Circuit Approves Special (And Strange) Conditions of Supervised Release

ADVERTISEMENTS

United States v. Ayers, No. 08-6286-cr (2d Cir. March 30, 2010) (found here)

Ayers was convicted of, and sentenced to ten years for, receipt of child pornography.  He appealed from an order modifying the conditions of his supervision to include polygraph and computerized voice-stress examinations.

In general, a district court may impose a special condition of supervised release so long as the condition: (1) is "reasonably relevant" to the nature of the offense and to the goals of deterrence, rehabilitation and public safety; (2) "involves no greater deprivation of liberty than is reasonably necessary" to achieve those goals; and (3) "is consistent with any pertinent policy statements issued by the Sentencing Commission."  18 U.S.C. § 3583(d)(1)-(3).  Ayers didn't dispute that the supervised release conditions satisfy the first and third statutory requirements.  But he did contend that the condition violates the second because the district court's failure to prohibit the use of the examination results in any subsequent civil commitment proceeding under 18 U.S.C. § 4248 effects a greater deprivation of liberty than is warranted by the legitimate objects of supervision.

The Second Circuit disagreed.  Specifically, in determining whether a condition of supervised release imposes an unnecessary deprivation of liberty, it first "must identify the cognizable liberty interest with which the condition interferes."  And it found that the condition imposed on Ayers does not intrude on any cognizable liberty interest because the self-incrimination clause of the Fifth Amendment is limited to criminal cases.  Moreover, the Second Circuit found that "the use of supervised release testing results in civil commitment proceedings is hardly unrelated to the sentencing goals of deterrence, public safety, and rehabilitation, given the commitment statute's focus on (1) protecting the public from people who 'would have serious difficulty in refraining from sexually violent conduct or child molestation if released' . . . and (2) providing treatment for such people."

Full post as published by Second Circuit Sentencing Blog on March 30, 2010 (boomark / email).

Bloggers, promote your law blog by nominating your blog for inclusion in USLaw.com's Law Blog Directory and RSS Reader. Benefits described.
Lawsuits and Settlements

Related Searches

























































































































US Law
#1 Online Legal Resource













Your Blog Subscriptions
Subscribe to blogs

10,000+ Law Job Listings
Lawyer . Police . Paralegal . Etc
Earn a law-related degree
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.


Practice Area
Zip Code:

Contact a Lawyer Now!






0.0228 secs (new cache)