Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Arbitration & Mediation Blogs -> Florida Arbitration Law
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Arbitration & Mediation
: Florida Arbitration LawCalculating a Close-Call on Proposal for Settlement (Costs Must Be Incurred Pre-Proposal for Settlement)
By Christopher B. Hopkins, Esq.
The art of drafting a proposal for settlement involves the delicate balancing of procedural compliance, an educated guess as to the "right" amount, and -- after judgment -- the proper math to confirm whether your client "won" the battle of the fees. Historically, most Proposals for Settlement on appeal end up losing.
The case of Billy Rizal Nilo and Jo Ann Farrington Walker v. Gerald Fugate (First District, Kahn, Benton and Roberts) illustrates the complexities of Proposals for Settlements in close-call situations.
It appears a personal injury plaintiff served a $400k Proposal for Settlement on the defendant. There was no dispute about the format or procedure of the Proposal. The jury awarded $495k. The court entered an order of $32k in taxable costs to the prevailing party (plaintiff). The judgment was $527k, an amount well above the 125% required to award fees under a Proposal for Settlement, thus another $76k in attorney's fees was entered against the defendant.
First, note that Proposals work from the judgment, not the verdict. Second, the taxable costs in the judgment which are used to calculate the entitlement to the Proposal for Settlement must be incurred BEFORE the Proposal was served. In this case, that's where the problems arise.
Under Florida Statute 768.69, the plaintiff gets attorney's fees if the judgment is "an amount at least 25% greater than the offer..." Here, the Proposal was for $400k so the "magic number" needed to trigger fees under the Proposal is $500k.
In this case, the verdict was close -- $495k. The Plaintiff only needed to prove $5 in attributable taxable costs. However, we are not told what percentage of the taxable costs were incurred BEFORE the Proposal was served. Taxable costs spent at trial are recoverable to the prevailing party but are not included when determining the entitlement to attorney's fees under a Proposal for Settlement.
In mathematical terms, the calculation is [verdict - set offs] + [taxable costs pre-Proposal] > [Proposal amount] + [25% of Proposal amount].
Full post as published by Florida Arbitration Law on March 23, 2010 (boomark / email).
Settlement Proposed in Class Action Against Facebook
Facebook will Close Beacon in Proposed Settlement
Mississippi Antitrust
Costs Microsoft $100 Million
Austral Pacific Energy Ltd.
$1.6 million settlement reached in drilling costs dispute.
Perchlorate Contamination
San Bernardino pays city of Rialto $4 million settlement to aid in cleanup costs.
TXI Cement
$1 million Settlement and Clean-up Costs
Zyprexa Settlement
Costs Lilly $1.4 Billion

Fourth District: Rule 1.442 and Proposals for Settlement
Understanding TARP in Relation to Structured Settlement Annuity Companies
Fourth District: Rule 1.525, Ambiguous Proposals
Proposal Could Release 40,000 Inmates From California’s Overcrowded And Mismanaged Prison System
12/29/09 All-in-one Settlement Service Synergy Settlement Services









