Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Labor & Employment Law Blogs -> Ross' Employment Law Blog
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Labor & Employment Law
: Ross' Employment Law BlogSCOTUS to decide whether oral complaint is protected conduct under FLSA ant-retaliation provision
Kasten v. Saint-Gobain Performance Plastics Corp (certiorari granted 03/22/2010)
[Details, briefs]
Kasten sued the employer, asserting a retaliation claim under the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA). The trial court granted summary judgment in favor of the employer. The 7th Circuit affirmed.
Kasten alleged that he was discharged in retaliation for making verbal complaints to his superiors that the employer's placement of time clocks violated the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA). The FLSA's anti-retaliation provision prohibits an employer from retaliating against an employee because the employee "has filed any complaint...." 29 USC Section 215(a)(3).
The 7th Circuit held that "any complaint" includes an employee's internal ("intra-company") complaint. However, the court also held that an employee does not "file" such a complaint in this context when he submits the complaint in purely unwritten form. The court reasoned, "the natural understanding of the phrase 'file any complaint' requires the submission of some writing to an employer, court, or administrative body."
The 7th Circuit denied a rehearing en banc. Three judges DISSENTED from the denial of a rehearing, saying that "The court has adopted a construction of the Fair Labor Standard Act's anti-retaliation provision that is unique among the circuits." "[T]he court has taken a position contrary to the longstanding view of the Department of Labor, departed from the holdings of other circuits, and interpreted the statutory language in a way that I believe is contrary to the understanding of Congress."
The US Supreme Court granted certiorari to review the 7th Circuit judgment. The Court will decide the following question:
"Is an oral complaint of a violation of the Fair Labor Standards Act protected conduct under the anti-retaliation provision, 29 U.S.C. § 215(a)(3)?"
Full post as published by Ross' Employment Law Blog on March 22, 2010 (boomark / email).
Is Barack Obama a Natural Born Citizen?
Wrotnowski v. Bysiewicz (Supreme Court): Does Obama meet the constitutional requirements to be President
Parody is a Protected Form of Speech
Targets of criticism seek to shut down Internet sites that poke fun
Nevada Onion
Workers Injured, EPA Files Complaint
Wrongful Death
alleging death was caused by the conduct of negligent defendant.
Oral HRT
More Than Doubles the Risk of Blood Clots
Blood Clots
Associated with Oral Contraceptives Yaz and Yasmin
Generic Versions
Barr Pharmaceuticals to pay $5.9 million settlement for blocking the sale of oral contraceptives.
Oral Sodium Phosphate
or OSP has allegedly been recalled for acute kidney injury and kidney failure.

7thCir: Informal complaint is protected activity under ADA
Fourth Circuit Rolls Out Yet Another FLSA Case, This One Favoring Employees Alleging Retaliation
7thCir: Only written complaints are FLSA-protected activity; rehearing denied
SCOTUS will decide limits, if any, of prosecutorial immunity
5th Circuit View on Retaliation Under the FLSA
Retaliation Must Be Taken Seriously By Employers and Employees









