Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Legal Commentary Blogs -> LawPundit
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Legal Commentary
: LawPunditThe U.S. Federal Circuit Court Strikes Again, Enabling a New Patent Scam : Patent Marking Trolls
By Andis Kaulins
"Under Section 292(a) of the Patent Act, marking an unpatented article with intent to deceive the public mandates a fine of ?not more than $500 for every such offense.? In The Forest Group, Inc. v. Bon Tool Co., No. 2009-1044 (Fed. Cir. Dec. 28, 2009), the court construed that provision to require imposition of the fine on a per-article basis (as opposed to a per-decision basis). Thus, a false patent marking on one million individual articles could generate an award of up to $500 million. Any persons can serve as plaintiffs in this ?qui tam? cause of action, whether or not they have an interest in a patent or suffer any personal injury.
The Federal Circuit recognized that its ruling would encourage ?a new cottage industry? of false marking litigation by plaintiffs who have not suffered any direct harm, but it concluded that such a consequence is imposed by the plain language of the statute."Read the whole thing here.
Our comment: can't they get some judges into the Federal Circuit who have even a minimal understanding of THE LAW - "the law", folks, which consists not merely of statutes but of the sensible application of same.
Full post as published by LawPundit on March 12, 2010 (boomark / email).
Selection of State Supreme Court Judges
How State Court Judges are Selected
Law Enforcement and Criminal Justice Career Choices
Descriptions of law enforcement occupations
Privacy Protection Act 42 USC 21A
Federal Newsroom Law
California Supreme Court Proposition 8 Decision
Court Rejects Challenges to Proposition 8, but Finds Marriages Valid
Federal Adoption Tax Credit
Financial Incentive for Adoptive Parents
Is Barack Obama a Natural Born Citizen?
Wrotnowski v. Bysiewicz (Supreme Court): Does Obama meet the constitutional requirements to be President
Zantac Patent
GlaxoSmithKline and Cypress Pharmaceutical settle patent infringement dispute.
Soliris Patent
Alexion Pharmaceuticals Inc. agrees to pay the Oklahoma Medical Research Foundation a $10 million patent infringement settlement.
DRAM Patent
ProMOS Technologies and Mosel Vitelic pay MOSAID Technologies an undisclosed patent infringement settlement.
Sony
to Pay $18.5 Million For Patent Infringment
Qualcomm Settles Patent Suit for $891 Million
The Princeton Review
$2.6 million settlement reached in patent infringement case.

Patent Marking - Court Cautions Against Marking Product if Patent is Expired
Trolls II - Realities & Myths in Patent Litigation Today
Patent Trolls Statistics, will Europe escape the trolls
Coming soon to a bridge under you
How Sun Tzu Would Outflank Patent Trolls








