ADVERTISEMENT



Google       

Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Labor & Employment Law Blogs -> Ross' Employment Law Blog

OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense

Find a Local Lawyer

Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402

Bookmark

Labor & Employment Law

: Ross' Employment Law Blog

Supreme Court will decide constitutionality of NASA background investigation.

ADVERTISEMENTS

The US Supreme Court announced today that it will review a controversial decision from the 9th Circuit - National Aeronautics and Space Administration [NASA] v. Nelson.

Nelson requested a preliminary injunction to prevent implementation of NASA's requirement for in-depth background investigations of "low risk" contract employees. The trial court denied the request for a preliminary injunction. The 9th Circuit reversed.

Given the open-ended and highly private questions authorized by the investigation which did not appear narrowly tailored to any legitimate government interest, the 9th Circuit concluded the trial court erred in finding that Nelson was unlikely to succeed on his informational privacy claim. The court stated the balance of hardships tipped sharply towards Nelson, who faced a stark choice - either violation of his constitutional rights or loss of his job.

The US Supreme Court granted certiorari to review the 9th Circuit judgment.

We expect oral arguments to be scheduled for the fall of 2010.

Question presented:

1. Whether the government violates a federal contract employee?s constitutional right to informational privacy when it asks in the course of a background investigation whether the employee has received counseling or treatment for illegal drug use that has occurred within the past year, and the employee?s response is used only for employment purposes and is protected under the Privacy Act, 5 U.S.C. 552a.

2. Whether the government violates a federal contract employee?s constitutional right to informational privacy when it asks the employee?s designated references for any adverse information that may have a bearing on the employee?s suitability for employment at a federal facility, the reference?s response is used only for employment purposes, and the information obtained is protected under the Privacy Act, 5 U.S.C. 552a.

Full post as published by Ross' Employment Law Blog on March 08, 2010 (boomark / email).

Bloggers, promote your law blog by nominating your blog for inclusion in USLaw.com's Law Blog Directory and RSS Reader. Benefits described.
Related Law Articles

Lawsuits and Settlements

Related Searches

























































































































US Law
#1 Online Legal Resource













Your Blog Subscriptions
Subscribe to blogs

10,000+ Law Job Listings
Lawyer . Police . Paralegal . Etc
Earn a law-related degree
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.


Practice Area
Zip Code:

Contact a Lawyer Now!






0.0132 secs (new cache)