Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Labor & Employment Law Blogs -> Ross' Employment Law Blog
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Labor & Employment Law
: Ross' Employment Law BlogSupreme Court will decide constitutionality of NASA background investigation.
The US Supreme Court announced today that it will review a controversial decision from the 9th Circuit - National Aeronautics and Space Administration [NASA] v. Nelson.
Nelson requested a preliminary injunction to prevent implementation of NASA's requirement for in-depth background investigations of "low risk" contract employees. The trial court denied the request for a preliminary injunction. The 9th Circuit reversed.
Given the open-ended and highly private questions authorized by the investigation which did not appear narrowly tailored to any legitimate government interest, the 9th Circuit concluded the trial court erred in finding that Nelson was unlikely to succeed on his informational privacy claim. The court stated the balance of hardships tipped sharply towards Nelson, who faced a stark choice - either violation of his constitutional rights or loss of his job.
The US Supreme Court granted certiorari to review the 9th Circuit judgment.
We expect oral arguments to be scheduled for the fall of 2010.
Question presented:
1. Whether the government violates a federal contract employee?s constitutional right to informational privacy when it asks in the course of a background investigation whether the employee has received counseling or treatment for illegal drug use that has occurred within the past year, and the employee?s response is used only for employment purposes and is protected under the Privacy Act, 5 U.S.C. 552a.2. Whether the government violates a federal contract employee?s constitutional right to informational privacy when it asks the employee?s designated references for any adverse information that may have a bearing on the employee?s suitability for employment at a federal facility, the reference?s response is used only for employment purposes, and the information obtained is protected under the Privacy Act, 5 U.S.C. 552a.
Full post as published by Ross' Employment Law Blog on March 08, 2010 (boomark / email).
Selection of State Supreme Court Judges
How State Court Judges are Selected
California Supreme Court Proposition 8 Decision
Court Rejects Challenges to Proposition 8, but Finds Marriages Valid
Is Barack Obama a Natural Born Citizen?
Wrotnowski v. Bysiewicz (Supreme Court): Does Obama meet the constitutional requirements to be President
Unwed Fathers' Rights in Adoption
Landmark Cases in Adoption Law Shape Law with respect to Unwed Fathers
Employee Lawsuits
Dealing with violence in the workplace
Law Enforcement and Criminal Justice Career Choices
Descriptions of law enforcement occupations
Wells Fargo Settles New Jersey State Investigation into Pick-a-Payment Mortgages
Wells Fargo Settles New Jersey State Investigation into Pick-a-Payment Mortgages
McAfee, Symantec
Settle Investigation into Automatic Antivirus Subscription Practices
Schering Plough, Merck
Settle Multi-State Investigation for $5.4 Million
Ebay Fined
French Court Sets Fine at $61 Million
Personal Injury
Appeals Court Upholds Congressional Legislation
Tomato Salmonella
Sheetz Convenience Stores agrees to confidential out-of-court settlement with food poisoning victim.

Court will decide if NASA checks can continue
Texas Supreme Court to Decide Constitutionality of 'Pole Tax'
Background checks of NASA scientists threaten their rights
California Supreme Court Agrees To Decide Constitutionality of Prop. 8:
Ansolabehere and Persily: Deciding Not to Decide...For Now
Notable Ohio Supreme Court ruling on constitutionality of "blended" juve sentences







