Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Academic Blogs -> The Faculty Lounge
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Academic
: The Faculty LoungeMcDonald Oral Argument
By Calvin Massey
At SCOTUSblog, Lyle Denniston has this report on today's oral argument in McDonald v. City of Chicago. The gist of Denniston's story is that incorporation of the Second Amendment via the privileges and immunities clasue of the 14th Amendment is a non-starter (no surprise there) but that incorporation via the due process clause looks like a done deal. The only issue is whether incorporation will be limited to some "core right" or extend to whatever the scope of the Second Amendment right will turn out to be as Second Amendment jurisprudence develops. Of course, all of this is speculation based on oral argument alone.
Nevertheless, the idea that incorporation should be limited to some "core" aspect of the Second Amendment is indefensible in terms of prior incorporation law and is incoherent in terms of the Second Amendment. All other incorporated Bill of Rights guarantees are fully incorporated; indeed the operative principle is so-called "jot-for-jot" incorporation, by whic the scope of the right is identical whether asserted against the federal government or a state. There is no reason why the Second Amendment should be the Second-Class Amendment when it comes to incorporation. Moreover, given the paucity of jurisprudential flesh on the Second Amendment skeleton (Heller is it, so far) it is premature to identify a "core right." We don't know what the Second Amendment encompasses, but whatever is included in it should be equally enforceable against any government. The action in this area will be to determine the decision rules that determine when a government has validly regulated the exercise of the right and when it has invalidly infringed the right. To limit incorporation to some prematurely determined "core right" is to ignore the hard work of creating those decision rules when it comes to the states, even while that work must be done with respect to federal gun regulations. That makes no sense.
Full post as published by The Faculty Lounge on March 02, 2010 (boomark / email).
McDonald's
Hit with Hepatitis Class Action
Oral HRT
More Than Doubles the Risk of Blood Clots
Blood Clots
Associated with Oral Contraceptives Yaz and Yasmin
Generic Versions
Barr Pharmaceuticals to pay $5.9 million settlement for blocking the sale of oral contraceptives.
Oral Sodium Phosphate
or OSP has allegedly been recalled for acute kidney injury and kidney failure.

NRA Gets Oral Argument Time in McDonald v. City of Chicago
McDonald v. Chicago oral argument scheduled
More on the McDonald Argument: A Reply to Randy







