Legal Commentary

Hamburger and McDonald[s]?

By Orin Kerr

Thanks to Jim for posting Philip Hamburger?s very interesting new paper on the original meaning of the privileges or immunities clause. With the oral argument in McDonald just a few days away, I?m curious what readers who follow these issues closely think of Hamburger?s paper. I?m not enough of a historian to have a firm sense of which side is right, so I?m interested in what our readers think. (Oh, and sorry for the post title: I know, I know, I really shouldn?t have done that, but I just couldn?t help myself.)

Full post as published by The Volokh Conspiracy on February 26, 2010 (boomark / email).