Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Miscellaneous Blogs -> PI buzz
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Miscellaneous
: PI buzzOnline court indexes are incomplete
By PI Magazine (Tamara Thompson and Rosemarie Mesis)
Public records researchers know that the online court case index for any one county may not be as reliable as the one maintained at the courthouse. BRBPub reports that as much as 15 percent of counties have inaccuracies.
Some of the typical shortcomings noted for the online search of court records include missing cases, incorrect/missing IDs, wrong charge codes, missing dispositions, lack of sentence details, and missing probation updates/violations. The date range of online records online is often much shorter compared to searching in-person.
BRBpub has added a feature for subscribers to its Public Records Retriever Network — a nationwide directory of companies that search onsite government public records — that displays a warning when there is a discrepancy between the online database and the onsite index. Their caution for Hennepin County, Minnesota reads:
The online system for court records is incomplete. The federal Violence Against Women Act (VAWA) prevents the state from displaying harassment and domestic abuse case records online, but these convictions are available at the courthouse. Comment fields for all case types are not available online but are available at the courthouse. Party street address and name searches on criminal, traffic, and petty misdemeanor pre-conviction case records are not accessible, but are at the courthouse. Also missing are pending/filed cases, warrants, probation before conviction, and continue for diversion programs. A criminal/traffic/petty search excludes all Hennepin County and Ramsey County payable citations except: 1) those that result in a court appearance; and 2) Ramsey DNR payable citations.
Also, the Errors and Omissions insurance that private investigators maintain excludes online court research for background checks. You should tell your clients. Then they may appreciate why it’s cost-effective and prudent to pay you to go to the courthouse.
Full post as published by PI buzz on February 28, 2010 (boomark / email).
Selection of State Supreme Court Judges
How State Court Judges are Selected
Law Enforcement and Criminal Justice Career Choices
Descriptions of law enforcement occupations
California Supreme Court Proposition 8 Decision
Court Rejects Challenges to Proposition 8, but Finds Marriages Valid
Is Barack Obama a Natural Born Citizen?
Wrotnowski v. Bysiewicz (Supreme Court): Does Obama meet the constitutional requirements to be President
Heart of Atlanta v United States
Supreme Court Decision: Civil Rights Act Protected by Interstate Commerce Clause
Unwed Fathers' Rights in Adoption
Landmark Cases in Adoption Law Shape Law with respect to Unwed Fathers
Online Ticket Vendor
Buying Tickets Online That Never Arrive
Ebay Fined
French Court Sets Fine at $61 Million
Personal Injury
Appeals Court Upholds Congressional Legislation
Kimkins
alleging false advertising of online dieting.
Online Medication Sites
Prescription Drugs Sold Without Prescriptions
Marketing Spam
Member Source Media pays $200,000 civil penalty for deceptive online advertising.

Will Someone Please Fix The CT Statute Indexes
New Dharma Stock Indexes Announced
Tip When Checking Old (Late 1700s and Early 1800s) Sources:
About Online Access to Public Records
S&P Launches Three CDS Indexes








