Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Legal News Blogs -> Law Blog - WSJ.com
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Legal News
: Law Blog - WSJ.comOne Hot Potato: Cravath Case Bounced Back to Delaware
By Ashby Jones
Well, the situation involving Airgas, Air Products and the law firm Cravath, Swaine & Moore hasn’t resolved itself. But it has gotten a nice little tour of southeastern Pennsylvania and northern Delaware. (Had time to check out the Wyeth exhibitions at the Brandywine, all?)
The latest: the parties will leave Philadelphia and head back down I-95 to Wilmington, where they’ll likely get a final ruling on whether Cravath should be allowed to continue representing Air Products. The latest move comes at the hand of Philadelphia federal judge Edward Robreno, who on Monday kicked the decision back to the Delaware Court of Chancery. Click here for the opinion; here for a writeup from the American Lawyer’s Zach Lowe. Click here, here and here, for LB background on the dustup.
In his ruling Robreno laid out a handful of reasons why the case should be kicked back to Delaware. Among them was the following:
Public policy concerns implicating federalism and comity attach to the decision to allow a federal court to disqualify Cravath from appearing as counsel for a litigant in a state court proceeding. Historically, the credentialing and discipline of lawyers has been a state function. . . . It would constitute an unprecedented intrusion of federal power upon a local court for this Court to dictate to the Delaware Chancery Court that a law firm [Cravath] wasdisqualified from representing a litigant [Air Products] in a proceeding before it. Airgas has not produced any authority, and the Court has not located any, where such an extreme result has obtained.
AmLaw’s Lowe calls the decision “a victory for Air Products and Cravath, which wanted the disqualification issue heard in Delaware.”
At the same time, this may not be the last Robreno sees of the case. He said he will hear Airgas’s case against Cravath over whether the firm should have to pay damages for allegedly violating conflicts rules once the Chancery Court rules on the broader disqualification issue.
Full post as published by Law Blog - WSJ.com on February 23, 2010 (boomark / email).
Chattanooga, TN
Seven months in back pay resolves pepper spray dispute.
Deja Vu
Exotic Dancers file class action claiming back wages
Canadian Government
former RCMP officer claims thousands of disability dollars clawed back.
Gleevec
Possible Case of Kidney Damage Reported
Hampton Inn
Third Case of Legionnaires' Disease Linked to McHenry Hampton Inn Hot Tub
18-Wheeler Accident Case Settled for $600,000
18-Wheeler Accident Case Settled for $600,000

Even The Elites Are...Suffering Cravath Profits Slide
Pringles, Potato Chips and the Law
Judge: Pringles Are Not Potato Chips, So Are Exempt From U.K. 17.5% Potato Chip Tax
Cravath-Style Conflict Accusations Hit Blank Rome
Pringles Qualify as "Potato Chips," Court Rules








