ADVERTISEMENT



Google       

Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Legal News Blogs -> Law Blog - WSJ.com

OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense

Find a Local Lawyer

Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402

Bookmark

Legal News

: Law Blog - WSJ.com

One Hot Potato: Cravath Case Bounced Back to Delaware

By Ashby Jones

ADVERTISEMENTS

Well, the situation involving Airgas, Air Products and the law firm Cravath, Swaine & Moore hasn’t resolved itself. But it has gotten a nice little tour of southeastern Pennsylvania and northern Delaware. (Had time to check out the Wyeth exhibitions at the Brandywine, all?)

The latest: the parties will leave Philadelphia and head back down I-95 to Wilmington, where they’ll likely get a final ruling on whether Cravath should be allowed to continue representing Air Products. The latest move comes at the hand of Philadelphia federal judge Edward Robreno, who on Monday kicked the decision back to the Delaware Court of Chancery. Click here for the opinion; here for a writeup from the American Lawyer’s Zach Lowe. Click here, here and here, for LB background on the dustup.

In his ruling Robreno laid out a handful of reasons why the case should be kicked back to Delaware. Among them was the following:

Public policy concerns implicating federalism and comity attach to the decision to allow a federal court to disqualify Cravath from appearing as counsel for a litigant in a state court proceeding. Historically, the credentialing and discipline of lawyers has been a state function. . . . It would constitute an unprecedented intrusion of federal power upon a local court for this Court to dictate to the Delaware Chancery Court that a law firm [Cravath] wasdisqualified from representing a litigant [Air Products] in a proceeding before it. Airgas has not produced any authority, and the Court has not located any, where such an extreme result has obtained.

AmLaw’s Lowe calls the decision “a victory for Air Products and Cravath, which wanted the disqualification issue heard in Delaware.”

At the same time, this may not be the last Robreno sees of the case. He said he will hear Airgas’s case against Cravath over whether the firm should have to pay damages for allegedly violating conflicts rules once the Chancery Court rules on the broader disqualification issue.


Full post as published by Law Blog - WSJ.com on February 23, 2010 (boomark / email).

Bloggers, promote your law blog by nominating your blog for inclusion in USLaw.com's Law Blog Directory and RSS Reader. Benefits described.
Lawsuits and Settlements

Related Searches

























































































































US Law
#1 Online Legal Resource













Your Blog Subscriptions
Subscribe to blogs

10,000+ Law Job Listings
Lawyer . Police . Paralegal . Etc
Earn a law-related degree
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.


Practice Area
Zip Code:

Contact a Lawyer Now!






0.0287 secs (new cache)