Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Patent Law Blogs -> Patently Obvious
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Patent Law
: Patently ObviousPatent Examiner Experience Levels, Part II
By Dennis Crouch, Esq.
The graph below shows examiner experience as grouped by technology center as of the end of FY2009. The blue-bars represent the percent of examiners and SPEs that have fewer than three years experience at the PTO. The red-bars represent the percent of examiners and SPEs that have ten or more years experience at the PTO. This is a continuation of an earlier discussion.
Full post as published by Patently Obvious on February 08, 2010 (boomark / email).
Zantac Patent
GlaxoSmithKline and Cypress Pharmaceutical settle patent infringement dispute.
Soliris Patent
Alexion Pharmaceuticals Inc. agrees to pay the Oklahoma Medical Research Foundation a $10 million patent infringement settlement.
DRAM Patent
ProMOS Technologies and Mosel Vitelic pay MOSAID Technologies an undisclosed patent infringement settlement.
Air Pollution
Low Levels May Increase Stroke Risk
Herbal Medicines
Contain High Levels of Toxic Metals
Casper Halloween Figures
Recalled due to High Lead Levels

USPTO Pilot Program May Benefit Patent Applications in the Fields of Computers and Data Processing
Study: Experienced Examiners Allow More, Cite Less
Patent Decision: Lapse of Rights
A FEW WAYS TO GET ON THE BAD SIDE OF YOUR EXAMINER
USPTO Joint Labor-Management Task Force Proposes Significant Changes to Examiner Count System
USPTO Launches Interactive Patent Pendency Model








