Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Legal Niches Blogs -> E-Commerce Law
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Legal Niches
: E-Commerce LawWebsite Lauding Defendant's "Worldwide Expertise" and Facilitating One-Way Contact to the Defendant Too Passive to Confer Jurisdiction
In Jensen v. Modern Aero, Inc., 2010 WL 88229 (Minn. App. Jan. 12, 2010), the Court of Appeals of Minnesota held that a defendant's website, which lauded defendant's "worldwide" expertise," listed a toll-free telephone number for defendant, and provided an electronic form for customers to contact the defendant, was insufficient to confer general personal jurisdiction over the defendant. Accordingly, the Court affirmed the dismissal of negligence claims brought by the estate of a pilot who died in the crash of his small private airplane.
In rejecting Jensen's argument in favor of general jursidiction, the Court applied the reasoning articulated in Lakin v. Prudential Sec., Inc., 348 F.3d 704, 709 (8th Cir. 2003) in which the "critical question" is whether "a defendant's activity in the forum state is continuous and systematic." "In Lakin, however, the Eighth Circuit observed that, in most cases the question of whether a website can create personal jurisdiction is pertinent to the issue of specific personal jurisdiction. In determining wether a defendant's website satisfies the requirements of general personal jurisdiction, the Eighth Circuit first applied the test articulated in Zippo Mfg. Co. v. Zippo Dot Com, Inc., 952 F.Supp. 1119, 1124 (W.D. Pa. 1997), but also required contacts with the forum state through the website to be of a substantial quantity." Jensen, 2010 WL 88229, at *2.
Noting that a passive website - one that "does little more than make information available to those who are interested in it" - cannot confer personal jursidiction, the Court found that the district court properly concluded that Modern Aero's website was "passive" and "at best . . . a worldwide website which allows customers to contact [Modern Aero's] sole facility in Colorado." Accordingly, the Court agreed that Modern Aero's website was not sufficiently interactive to confer personal jurisdiction over Modern Aero under the Zippo test, as adopted in Lakin.
If you enjoyed this post, click here for ways you can have the latest content from E-Commerce Law delivered directly to your desktop or email account.
Full post as published by E-Commerce Law on January 24, 2010 (boomark / email).
Bausch Lomb Renu Moistureloc Linked to Eye Infection Fusarium Keratiti
Contact Lens Solution Product Recall
Bausch Lomb Renu Moistureloc Recall
Contact Lens Solution Product Recall
Wrongful Death
alleging death was caused by the conduct of negligent defendant.
Toyota
Recalls 1 Million Plus Cars Worldwide
Stephen J. Hyland
alleging fraudulent operations in offering expertise in same gender couples' issues.
Bank Website Security
New Report Finds Widespread Flaws
Construction Contact
Kilbourn Tower pays the city of Milwaukee a $950,000 settlement.
DUI/DWI
If you have been arrested for drunk driving or driving under the influence you should contact an attorney immediately.

Magistrate's Entry of Judgment Conclusive for Determining Appellate Jurisdiction
Indiana jurisdiction over out-of-state defendants
Expert Witness Websites - Contact Info
Eleventh Circuit: The Reality of Virtual Contact








