ADVERTISEMENT



Google       

Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Litigation Blogs -> The Gavel

OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense

Find a Local Lawyer

Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402

Bookmark

Litigation

: The Gavel

Minnesotans Push for Retention Election System

By Nancy Palencia

ADVERTISEMENTS

Minnesota SealIn an effort to fight special interest spending on judicial elections, the legislature of Minnesota is considering a constitutional amendment that would change the retention process of judges.

Under the amendment, which would have be submitted to voters, all judges would face periodic retention elections. Only the incumbent judges would be on the ballot and voters would decide whether to grant another term. Currently, judges can be challenged by other candidates, which can lead to costly elections. But in Minnesota, most draw no opposition and are automatically reelected. About 90 percent of judges also are initially appointed to courts, after other judges retire during their terms.

This constitutional amendment is intended to reduce high election spending and the appearance of political influence, as was seen in the Supreme Court case of Caperton v. Massey. In that case, a West Virginia judge was ordered not to participate in a case involving a coal executive who spent $3 million to help elect him.

In addition to changing the retention process, the amendment includes provisions to improve the performance of judges. Judges would undergo evaluations conducted ?by an independent commission,? according to the Morrison County Record.  The commission’s finding would be made public before the retention elections. 

The paper states that the proposed constitutional amendment has received praise from a variety of people including district judges. ?Judge Susan Miles of Scandia, president of the Minnesota District Judges Association, said that while the state?s judges had long preferred the current system, they have become increasingly worried that the independence and impartiality of the judicial system is being threatened.?

For more information about Caperton v. Massey, go to Justice at Stake. For more information about the proposed amendment, visit Minnesotans for Impartial Courts.

Full post as published by The Gavel on January 15, 2010 (boomark / email).

Bloggers, promote your law blog by nominating your blog for inclusion in USLaw.com's Law Blog Directory and RSS Reader. Benefits described.
Related Law Articles

Lawsuits and Settlements

Related Searches

























































































































US Law
#1 Online Legal Resource













Your Blog Subscriptions
Subscribe to blogs

10,000+ Law Job Listings
Lawyer . Police . Paralegal . Etc
Earn a law-related degree
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.


Practice Area
Zip Code:

Contact a Lawyer Now!






0.026 secs (new cache)