Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Patent Law Blogs -> Patently Obvious
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Patent Law
: Patently ObviousPatent Law Exam: Pioneering Patents
By Dennis Crouch, Esq.
Here is the ‘policy question' from my 2009 patent law exam:
Essay 3 (15 points)
Congressman I. N. Venter has proposed an amendment to the Patent Act that would create a special right known as a 'pioneering patent.' According to the proposal, pioneering patents would be awarded for inventions that are both the product of genius and that dramatically alter the technology landscape. Examples might include the airplane and the polymerase chain reaction (PCR). The pioneering patent would require greater evidence of nonobviousness, but the applicant would be allowed to pursue broader claims that might not otherwise satisfy the enablement and written description requirements of Section 112. What are the pros and cons of this proposal? Would a better approach be to extend the patent term a number of additional years for inventions determined to be pioneering? (I.e., longer patents instead of broader patents).
Full post as published by Patently Obvious on December 29, 2009 (boomark / email).
Zantac Patent
GlaxoSmithKline and Cypress Pharmaceutical settle patent infringement dispute.
Soliris Patent
Alexion Pharmaceuticals Inc. agrees to pay the Oklahoma Medical Research Foundation a $10 million patent infringement settlement.
DRAM Patent
ProMOS Technologies and Mosel Vitelic pay MOSAID Technologies an undisclosed patent infringement settlement.
Sony
to Pay $18.5 Million For Patent Infringment
Qualcomm Settles Patent Suit for $891 Million
The Princeton Review
$2.6 million settlement reached in patent infringement case.

Battling press releases on meaning of re-exam results
Patent Information Session: Exam Tips and Career Strategies
Patent Law Information Session








