ADVERTISEMENT



Google       

Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Copyright Law Blogs -> ZeroPaid

OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense

Find a Local Lawyer

Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402

Bookmark

Copyright Law

: ZeroPaid

Aussie Christian Lobby Wants X, R-Rated Content Filtered Too

By Jared Moya

ADVERTISEMENTS

Says govt’s proposed mandatory filtering proposal should be reexamined in 3yrs so as to extend it to cover “other harmful X and R-rated material on the Internet,” proving critics of the plans worst fears.

Today Senator Stephen Conroy, the Australian Minister for Broadband, Communications and the Digital Economy, finally revealed ?cyber-safety measures? to ?improve safety on the internet for Australian families.?

The scheme would require mandatory ISP-level filtering of Refused Classification (RC)-rated content and would introduce a grants program for encouraging ISPs to voluntarily ?block additional content as requested by households.?

Critics like the Australian Democrat Party have pointed out that the plan establishes a bad precedent for allowing the Government to control the flow of information before it reaches households and that it’s hard to imagine this and future governments would be able to resist the temptation to add content to the list when lobbied by powerful business, religious, or social group lobbies.

As if right on cue the powerful Australian Christian Lobby has chimed in, demanding that after three years the filter be reviewed to possibly extend it to “deal with other harmful X and R-rated material on the Internet.”

ACL’s Managing Director Jim Wallace said that in an era when children are growing up using the Internet for both education and entertainment it is crucial that Internet safeguards be “provided, and extended in scope to provide even better protection.”

It’s not clear if he’s proposing that X and R-rated content be filtered for all, but it illustrates that allowing the govt to establish an ISP-level filter in the first place is rife with danger and is susceptible to abuse.

Isn’t censorship a greater danger than children having access to pornographic material?

What the govt really needs is a mandatory filtering of uninvolved parents who don’t want to have to bother with monitoring their kids PC usage.

Stay tuned.

jared@zeropaid.com

Full post as published by ZeroPaid on December 15, 2009 (boomark / email).

Bloggers, promote your law blog by nominating your blog for inclusion in USLaw.com's Law Blog Directory and RSS Reader. Benefits described.
Lawsuits and Settlements

Related Searches

























































































































US Law
#1 Online Legal Resource













Your Blog Subscriptions
Subscribe to blogs

10,000+ Law Job Listings
Lawyer . Police . Paralegal . Etc
Earn a law-related degree
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.


Practice Area
Zip Code:

Contact a Lawyer Now!






0.0136 secs (new cache)