ADVERTISEMENT



Google       

Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Legal Commentary Blogs -> The Volokh Conspiracy

OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense

Find a Local Lawyer

Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402

Bookmark

Legal Commentary

: The Volokh Conspiracy

So . . . Where Are The (Argued) Supreme Court Cases? Part Deux

By John Elwood

ADVERTISEMENTS

The Court missed its hand-down opportunities this week (although the Justices favored us with another summary reversal on Monday, with Porter v. McCollum). Orders are expected Monday, and thus, as Roy Englert noted in the comment thread of my last post on this subject, it is probably out as a hand-down day for opinions in argued cases, since the Court tends not to issue opinions in argued cases on Mondays when it is both releasing orders and hearing argument. Thus, the first regular hand-down day of next week is December 8.

The Court thus appears to be on a glide-path to at least tie the latest initial hand-down day of the postwar era. (I?m obsessive-compulsive, but only obsessive-compulsive enough to check the stats back to October Term 1946; see my last post on the subject for the data.) The two other contenders are OT2007 and OT1984, both of which began on October 1 and had the first argued hand-down on December 4, a period of 64 days. If the first opinion in an argued case this Term is released on Tuesday, December 8, that will again be the 64th day of the Term. Of course, the arguments for the cases that will be decided this Term began during OT2008, on September 9, with Citizens United.

The slow start may portend significant dissents. (That said, I don?t recall many significant dissents among the first decisions out of OT07 or OT84, although the first opinions in OT07 were from the November sitting.) The Court?s four per curiam summary reversals (a high number for this early in the Term) may be contributing, but I don?t think they explain all the delay. We will see.


Copyright © 2009
This feed is for personal, non-commercial use only.
The use of this feed on other websites breaches copyright. If this content is not in your news reader, it makes the page you are viewing an infringement of the copyright. (Digital Fingerprint:
)

Full post as published by The Volokh Conspiracy on December 04, 2009 (boomark / email).

Bloggers, promote your law blog by nominating your blog for inclusion in USLaw.com's Law Blog Directory and RSS Reader. Benefits described.
Related Law Articles

Lawsuits and Settlements

Related Searches

























































































































US Law
#1 Online Legal Resource













Your Blog Subscriptions
Subscribe to blogs

10,000+ Law Job Listings
Lawyer . Police . Paralegal . Etc
Earn a law-related degree
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.


Practice Area
Zip Code:

Contact a Lawyer Now!






0.0129 secs (new cache)