ADVERTISEMENT



Google       

Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Estate Planning Blogs -> Toronto Estate Law Blog

OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense

Find a Local Lawyer

Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402

Bookmark

Estate Planning

: Toronto Estate Law Blog

Court Provides Further Guidance on Dispensing with Bonds

By Hull & Hull LLP

ADVERTISEMENTS

In the recent decision in Re Andrews Estate, the Superior Court of Justice at Toronto, provided further clarification regarding dispensing with an administration bond. 

A prospective executor is generally required to post a bond before probate is granted if (1) the executor resides out of the province; (2) a person has died with a will, but fails to name an executor; and (3) a person has died without a will. 

The earlier decision out Re Henderson Estate set out what an executor applying for probate should file in support of a request that the court dispense with the requirement of a bond and, in particular, what evidence should be contained in an affidavit (commonly called, an 'affidavit of debts').    

Re Andrews elaborated on the requirements found in Re Henderson and, in particular, the number of affidavits of debts that must be filed and the form they are required to take. 

There were two executors applying to dispense with a bond. In support of the application, one of the two filed an affidavit containing the information required by Re Henderson. The court office rejected it on the basis that each executor had to swear an affidavit. The Court found that this was not the case saying that to do so was redundant and did little than create unnecessary paper work.  Instead, the affidavit of one of the two was sufficient. 

In this case, the applicants had re-filed the materials, with the other executor swearing an affidavit. This second attempt was rejected by the court office on the basis that the affidavit did not specify that it was made in support of a motion to dispense with a bond. The court found that there was nothing in the Estates Act or Rules of Civil Procedure that required this type of language to be included.  

In the end concluded that, on the basis of the materials filed, it was an appropriate situation to dispense with a bond – and also apologized to the applicants for the delay.

Have a great day,

Megan F. Connolly

Megan F. Connolly - Click here for more information on Megan Connolly.

Full post as published by Toronto Estate Law Blog on December 01, 2009 (boomark / email).

Bloggers, promote your law blog by nominating your blog for inclusion in USLaw.com's Law Blog Directory and RSS Reader. Benefits described.
Related Law Articles

Lawsuits and Settlements

Related Searches

























































































































US Law
#1 Online Legal Resource













Your Blog Subscriptions
Subscribe to blogs

10,000+ Law Job Listings
Lawyer . Police . Paralegal . Etc
Earn a law-related degree
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.


Practice Area
Zip Code:

Contact a Lawyer Now!






0.0177 secs (new cache)