Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Personal Injury Law Blogs -> San Diego Injury Lawyer Blog
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Personal Injury Law
: San Diego Injury Lawyer BlogSan Diego Consumers Protected By Defeat of Tort Reform Class Action Legislation
By Ross Jurewitz
Earlier today, the California Assembly rejected AB 1505 by failing to pass it out of the Assembly Judiciary Committee.
The bill received so little support that when Van Tran (R-Costa Mesa) moved the bill, it did not receive a second and therefore failed without a vote.
The Civil Justice Association of California (CJAC) continues to press the meat of AB 1505 through a costly initiative process.
Assemblymember Nicole Parra (D-Hanford) stated, in bringing the bill, that it would do nothing from preventing legitimate class actions from being brought. However, she hoped that it would prevent lawyers from gaining large verdicts and plaintiff class membes seeing little compensation as a result. She further stated that AB 1505 attempted to align state with federal law.
However, according to the Consumer Attorneys of California (CAOC), AB 1505 would undermine the civil justice system by preventing an ordinary citizens' right to bring a class action lawsuit in California. Among the provisions of AB 1505 that CAOC objected to:
1. The bill would have required each individual class member to prove their individual claim and extent of damages. Most importantly, it would have required trial evidence on both the plaintiff and defense side to be "substantially the same".2. The bill would have given the defendant the right to bypass class counsle to communicate directly with class members to make a settlement offer directly to the defense. This would have bypassed and destroyed the attorney-client relationship. It would have also allowed the defenant to make low ball offers and use threats to force class members to disregard their counsel's advice.
3. The bill would also have stayed discovery of the merits of the case until the class was certified. This provision ignores the fact that the discovery process allows plaintiffs the ability to prove the existence of a broader class.
Full post as published by San Diego Injury Lawyer Blog on May 11, 2007 (boomark / email).
Paxil Lawsuit
Paxil Claims, Lawsuits, and Injuries
Parody is a Protected Form of Speech
Targets of criticism seek to shut down Internet sites that poke fun
Texas, USA
alleging the Medical Malpractice and Tort Reform Act of 2003 violates several provisions of the Constitution.
Airborne Settlement
Company agrees to pay consumers $23.3 million class action settlement for false advertising.
Auto Financing
Credit Acceptance Corp. agrees to $52.1 million class action settlement after overcharging consumers for fees and interest on automobile installment contracts.
Defective Furnaces
Carrier Corporation agrees to compensate consumers for high efficiency gas furnaces in class action settlement.
Personal Injury
Appeals Court Upholds Congressional Legislation
DirecTV
alleging a cancellation fee that is improperly or insufficiently disclosed to consumers.

Bad Faith As The Key To Tort Reform
Frank Analyzes Obama's Tort Reform Record
Tort reform: the 10-minute video
San Diego health program faces new legal challenge
Tort Reform Efforts Continue in Oklahoma







