ADVERTISEMENT



Google       

Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Consumer Law Blogs -> CL&P Blog

OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense

Find a Local Lawyer

Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402

Bookmark

Consumer Law

: CL&P Blog

Times Reports on Federal Bailout for Mortgage Crisis, the Riegel v. Medtronic Medical Device Case, and CPSC

By Jeff Sovern

ADVERTISEMENTS

The lead story in today's Times reports that "the Bush administration and Congress are considering costly new proposals for the government to rescue hundreds of thousands of homeowners whose mortgages are higher than the value of their houses."  According to the article, "nearly 8.8 million homeowners, or 10.3 percent of the total, are underwater."  Among the ideas being considered are "a federal mortgage guarantee for troubled borrowers . . . [and us[ing] government funds to purchase and refinance billions of dollars in mortgages now in danger of default."`  Meanwhile, on Monday the Times ran a story, "No Lull in Mortgage Pitches," about just that.  The article mentions advertising by Countrywide and the Bank of America, which is in the process of acquiring Countrywide, while today's piece notes that the Bank of America has proposed that a federal agency buy delinquent mortgages at a "deep discount."  Bank of America knows how to make a strong argument.

The Times has devoted a lot of space to the Supreme Court's Riegel v. Medtronic decision on medical devices and preemption.  An editorial in today's paper, "No Recourse for the Injured," criticizes the decision.  Here is an article about the effect of the decision on pending law suits.  Yesterday's issue had a news analysis, "Justices Add Legal Complications to Debate on F.D.A.'s Competence."  An excerpt:

The Institute of Medicine, the Government Accountability Office and the F.D.A.?s own science board have all issued reports concluding that poor management and scientific inadequacies have made the agency incapable of protecting the country against unsafe drugs, medical devices and food.

A result, said David Vladeck, a professor at Georgetown University Law Center, is that the public is facing the worst of both worlds: a government health agency that cannot protect them and rules that block them from winning compensation when injured.

Wednesday's paper included "Sears Case Cited by Critics of Safety Panel," which reported on criticism of the CPSC by Public Citizen.

Full post as published by CL&P Blog on February 22, 2008 (boomark / email).

Bloggers, promote your law blog by nominating your blog for inclusion in USLaw.com's Law Blog Directory and RSS Reader. Benefits described.
Related Law Articles

Lawsuits and Settlements

Related Searches

























































































































US Law
#1 Online Legal Resource













Your Blog Subscriptions
Subscribe to blogs

10,000+ Law Job Listings
Lawyer . Police . Paralegal . Etc
Earn a law-related degree
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.


Practice Area
Zip Code:

Contact a Lawyer Now!






0.0197 secs (new cache)