Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Trademark Law Blogs -> Las Vegas Trademark Attorney
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Trademark Law
: Las Vegas Trademark AttorneyDistrict Court finds money clip seller liable for Trademark Infringement based on Initial Interest Confusion
By Ryan Gile
The E-Commerce and Tech Law Blog had a post today (link here) about a California district court decision last week finding trademark infringement based on "initial interest confusion" -- a topic of interest to many in trademark circles. The case is Storus Corporation v. Aroa Marketing Inc. et al, Case No. 06-cv-07376 (N.D. Cal. February 15, 2008). A copy of the decision can be downloaded here.
In this case, Storus Corporation, a money clip manufacturer and owner of the registered mark SMART MONEY CLIP, sued Aroa Marketing Inc., a company which sells money clips and which participated in Google's AdWord program so that a Google search for "smart money clip" would generate an advertisement for Aroa's website (http://www.steinhausenonline.com/) which prominently displayed the mark SMART MONEY CLIP.
While the court decided on summary judgment that Aroa was liable for trademark infringement, the court denied summary judgment with respect to the other defendant, Skymall, Inc., because Storus apparently had not shown sufficient evidence that Skymall's search results would be any different in response to a consumer search using the phrase "smart money clip" compared to the phrase "money clip."
Full post as published by Las Vegas Trademark Attorney on February 21, 2008 (boomark / email).
Selection of State Supreme Court Judges
How State Court Judges are Selected
Law Enforcement and Criminal Justice Career Choices
Descriptions of law enforcement occupations
California Supreme Court Proposition 8 Decision
Court Rejects Challenges to Proposition 8, but Finds Marriages Valid
Is Barack Obama a Natural Born Citizen?
Wrotnowski v. Bysiewicz (Supreme Court): Does Obama meet the constitutional requirements to be President
Heart of Atlanta v United States
Supreme Court Decision: Civil Rights Act Protected by Interstate Commerce Clause
Unwed Fathers' Rights in Adoption
Landmark Cases in Adoption Law Shape Law with respect to Unwed Fathers
Teachers Paid
LA School District pays 8% interest to teachers for payroll problems.
Rutland School District
Double pay offered as part of class action wage dispute settlement, pending court approval.
Bank Website Security
New Report Finds Widespread Flaws
Adidas Imitators
Payless Shoesource to pay $304.6 million settlement in trademark lawsuit.
Money Mart Canada
Settles Class Action for $100 Million
Search Engine Optimization Claims
Web based company pays over $150,000 settlement in Internet lawsuit.

Use of Trademark in Keyword Search Caused Initial Interest Confusion
Eleventh Circuit: Trademark licensee liable for infringement when deviating from license
Arizona Keyword and Metatag Case
Metatags and infringement: Eleventh Circuit says, “Yes”
eBay Not Infringing SmartSearch Trademark
Tenth Circuit: No trademark infringement, unfair competition, or cybersquatting by parody sites








