Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Legal Commentary Blogs -> Prawfs
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Legal Commentary
: Prawfs"Jon & Kate (+ 8)" are great--at least for generating interesting legal questions
By Dan Markel, Ethan Leib, Rick Garnett, Matt Bodie, Paul Horwitz , Steve Vladeck, and Orly Lobel
There is no doubt that triplets, quadruplets, and other higher-order multiples (HOMs for short) attract attention. Taking our 23-month-old triplets out is always, well, a trip. People who venture out with us are always surprised by the attention that we draw, which runs the gamut from congratulatory to curious to downright rude. We usually ignore the rude comments and answer the "good-faith" questions honestly, and, so long as the boys are not busy grabbing things off store shelves, try to do so somewhat patiently. The usual comments (and my most sarcastic replies) are:
1. "Are those triplets?"
Reply: "No, they are all three years apart even though they are the same size. We give the smaller ones coffee and cigarettes."
2. "Are they natural?" (Or my favorite variant, "Did you use fertilizer?")
Reply: "No, they came from Mars." (Alternate reply: "Yes, three bags of Scott's Turfbuilder, actually."
3. "How did you get them?"
Reply: "Well, my husband and I were very busy that night..."
4. "Better you than me."
Reply: "Obviously."
While we have had plenty of onlookers who have proved that they could count to three or take cell phone pictures while inspecting our boys, we have never experienced anything so terribly obnoxious as what other parents of multiples have reportedly encountered, such as strangers who insist that their children are the products of irresponsible decision making. One apparently innocent comment, however, does raise my hackles due to the frequency with which it is asked:
5. "Do you watch that show "Jon & Kate +8""?
Reply: "Yes, triplets plus a career leave lots of time for watching TV."
For reasons that I really can't entirely verbalize, "Jon & Kate +8," a TLC reality TV show following the lives of Jon and Kate Gosselin and their 8 children (sextuplets and one set of twins), arouses my ire. Perhaps it is the sensationalism that seems to follow the family everywhere, or the public criticism of Kate's personality and parenting skills. Perhaps it is the fact that I seem to hear about the show everywhere I go. It's like an annoying song (like Kajagoogoo's unfortunate 1980s hit "Too Shy") that is continously on loop, playing in the background of every store I enter and every radio station I tune into.
Nonetheless, the show presents many interesting legal questions that I do find rather engrossing. The Pennsylvania Department of Labor is currently considering whether the Gosselins' reality show comports with the state's child labor laws. Each state has different child labor laws; children in California, predictably, are the most protected; regulations there, for instance, require 15% of each child's earnings to go into a "Coogan Account." However, Pennsylvania's laws have yet to catch up with the "family reality show" fad; in that state, children seven years of age and older can receive a work permit and begin to work in entertainment. Jon & Kate's twins, born in 2000, are older than seven, but their sextuplets (born in 2004) are clearly younger. This raises interesting issues. Are these children subject to child labor laws in the first place? The Gosselins' children are filmed during their day-to-day activities, including in their own home. Is this "work"? Yet, the Gosselins get paid a substantial amount of money--up to $75,000--per episode because these children appear on the show. The children--and their parents' dealings with them--are clearly the source of entertainment value. Jon and Kate are now clearly celebrities in their own right as well, but the Gosselins have only become famous through their higher-order multiples (HOMs).
As HOM births become more common, creating camera-ready families, states will need to update their child labor laws, making decisions that California has already considered: how strong can the lights be, and how long can the children be under them? What on-site care or tutoring must be provided? How many caretakers? Which financial arrangements will best protect the childrens' assets? I suppose we'll have to stay tuned.
Full post as published by Prawfs on August 16, 2009 (boomark / email).
Pre-paid Leagal Services
What are Prepaid Legal Benefit Plans
Income Tax Changes for 2007
Get Answers to your Income Tax Questions
Legal Forms
Business and Commercial Legal Forms
Best Law Movies
Greatest Legal Movies selected by ABA Journal
Law & Order Depicts Police Procedures and Criminal Justice
Accuracy of Criminal Justice Depiction on Television
Legal Malpractice
legal malpractice lawsuits.
Great-West Lifeco Must Pay $456 Million In London Life Class Action
Great-West Lifeco Must Pay $456 Million In London Life Class Action
Rock Band Great White
Settles Over 2003 Station NightClub Fire
Great Escape Lodge and Indoor Water Park
Faces Class Action
Jury Awards $1.8 Million in Legal Malpractice Suit
Jury Awards $1.8 Million in Legal Malpractice Suit
Alabama Restaurant Association Hires Legal Council to Help Members Damaged by BP Oil Spill
Alabama Restaurant Association Hires Legal Council to Help Members Damaged by BP Oil Spill>

Jon Plus Kate Labor Law Violations
Reality Sets in for Jon and Kate
Jon & Kate Divorce Papers are Deceiving
'Jon & Kate Plus 8' being investigated for child labor law violations (Reality TV World)
Keeping the kids out of it: Jon & Kate plus anger, infidelity, et cetera, et cetera, et cetera
How do you find interesting content on the Web about culture, society and art







