Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Class Action Blogs -> The UCL Practitioner
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Class Action
: The UCL PractitionerInvitation to comment on proposed rule on court closure days
By Kimberly A. Kralowec
As you may have heard, on July 29, the Judicial Council voted to institute court closure days, as authorized by newly-enacted Government Code section 68106. Here is the Report that led to that vote.
The Judicial Council has now issued proposed new Rule of Court 1.12 to implement this decision. The Rule would designate the third Wednesday of each month from September 2009 through June 2010 as court closure days and would confirm that closure days are treated as court holidays for purposes of calculating filing deadlines. Comments on the proposed Rule are due on a very short timeframe -- by 5:00 p.m. on Monday, August 17.
I thought the July press coverage was unclear respecting whether the Supreme Court would also be subject to the closure days. The proposed Rule makes plain that the Supreme Court will be closed, like the rest of the courts, on the third Wednesdays. This will, presumably, disrupt the Court's existing conference schedule for the rest of this year, as well as for 2010, and require rescheduling of the conferences set for September 16, October 21, November 18, December 16, and a series of third-Wednesday conferences in 2010.
Incidentally, tomorrow's conference is the final one before the Court's extended deadline (Aug. 14) to rule on the petition for rehearing in Tobacco. So check back here tomorrow for more on that.
Full post as published by The UCL Practitioner on August 11, 2009 (boomark / email).
Copyright Lawsuits: Critical Issues Before Filing Copyright
Federa Rule 11(b) Considerations
Selection of State Supreme Court Judges
How State Court Judges are Selected
Law Enforcement and Criminal Justice Career Choices
Descriptions of law enforcement occupations
California Supreme Court Proposition 8 Decision
Court Rejects Challenges to Proposition 8, but Finds Marriages Valid
Is Barack Obama a Natural Born Citizen?
Wrotnowski v. Bysiewicz (Supreme Court): Does Obama meet the constitutional requirements to be President
Heart of Atlanta v United States
Supreme Court Decision: Civil Rights Act Protected by Interstate Commerce Clause
Jevic Transportation
allegedly failing to give 60 days warning before closing plant.
Medical Malpractice
US Government awards family $750,000 settlement after woman dies after undergoing eight surgeries in 35 days.
Settlement Proposed in Class Action Against Facebook
Facebook will Close Beacon in Proposed Settlement
Ebay Fined
French Court Sets Fine at $61 Million
Personal Injury
Appeals Court Upholds Congressional Legislation
Tomato Salmonella
Sheetz Convenience Stores agrees to confidential out-of-court settlement with food poisoning victim.

Where to comment on allowing CCW holders to carry in national parks
List of States Actively Considering the Adoption of Special E-Discovery Court Rules
Delaware State Bar Association Submits Comments on SEC Proxy Access Proposal
Proposed NRAP changes, a little at a time: NRAP 40, 40A, 41, 42 and 43
New Rule Proposed ommercial Driver's License Testing
Ind. Courts - Proposed amendments to Court rules








