Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Personal Injury Law Blogs -> Legal Blog
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Personal Injury Law
: Legal BlogCourt of Appeals Reverses: No Liability Where Violation of Leash Law Without Pet Owner’s Prior Notice of Pet’s Vicious Propensity
Last year we wrote a blog about the case of Petrone v. Fernandez, 53 A.D.3d 221, 862 N.Y.S.2d 522 (2009), an Appellate Division, Second Department decision that held that liability can be imposed when the leash law violation is coupled with affirmative canine behavior such as a dog bite, or an attack upon the plaintiff, or where there is a history of prior violations, even in the absence of a showing that the dog owner or possessor had or should have had knowledge prior to the attack of the dog?s vicious propensities. The Second Department was apparently not completely sure of itself and the Appellate Division asked the Court of Appeals if this portion of its order was properly made. The Court of Appeals concluded that it was not. 12 N.Y.3d 546, — N.E.2d —-, 2009 WL 1585848, N.Y. Slip Op. 04694 (2009).
The court held that the liability of the owner of a domestic animal that causes harm is determined solely by the rule of strict liability for harm caused by a domestic animal - the owner must either know or should have known of the animal’s vicious propensities. The court explained that a leash law violation is evidence of negligence, and negligence is not a basis upon which to impose liability against the animal owner.
In a concurring opinion, Judge Eugene F. Pigott Jr. stated that he thought that it was wrong to reject negligence altogether as a basis for the liability of an animal owner. He contended negligence by an owner, even without knowledge concerning a domestic animal’s [vicious] propensity, may create liability.
If you or someone close to you has been attacked by a dog or injured in an accident, contact the personal injury lawyers at Levine & Slavit for their help. For 50 years spanning 3 generations, we have obtained results for satisfied clients. We have offices in Manhattan and Long Island, handling cases in New York City, the Bronx, Brooklyn, Queens and surrounding areas.
To learn more, watch our videos.
Full post as published by Legal Blog on August 07, 2009 (boomark / email).
Selection of State Supreme Court Judges
How State Court Judges are Selected
Law Enforcement and Criminal Justice Career Choices
Descriptions of law enforcement occupations
California Supreme Court Proposition 8 Decision
Court Rejects Challenges to Proposition 8, but Finds Marriages Valid
Is Barack Obama a Natural Born Citizen?
Wrotnowski v. Bysiewicz (Supreme Court): Does Obama meet the constitutional requirements to be President
Heart of Atlanta v United States
Supreme Court Decision: Civil Rights Act Protected by Interstate Commerce Clause
Unwed Fathers' Rights in Adoption
Landmark Cases in Adoption Law Shape Law with respect to Unwed Fathers
Personal Injury
Appeals Court Upholds Congressional Legislation
Ebay Fined
French Court Sets Fine at $61 Million
Chicago Golf Course
101 Year Old Owner Must Get $25 Million for Property
Environment Law
alleging damages from violation of the law.
CVS Mailing
Sparks Allegations of Privacy Violation
Tomato Salmonella
Sheetz Convenience Stores agrees to confidential out-of-court settlement with food poisoning victim.

Oh (de)Jesus! Calling propensity propensity
GA: Supreme Court reverses pds contempt conviction
Court of Appeals Reverses Eviction on Improper Service of Eviction Notice
Can Tort Theory Enable Plaintiff to Recover UDRP Filing Fees
Leash law has some dog owners barking mad (UPI)









