Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Academic Blogs -> Adjunct Law Prof Blog
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Academic
: Adjunct Law Prof Blog9th Issue Primer On Public Employee Free Speech
By Mitchell H. Rubinstein
Full post as published by Adjunct Law Prof Blog on August 07, 2009 (boomark / email).
Parody is a Protected Form of Speech
Targets of criticism seek to shut down Internet sites that poke fun
Employee Lawsuits (An Introduction and Topic Overview)
How employers can cope with the siege of employee lawsuits
Employee Lawsuits: Negligent Hiring and Retention
Employers must check references, criminal records, other background material.
Free Speech
Canterbury agrees to pay $60,000 settlement in civil rights lawsuit.
Indianapolis
alleging the city's police are overly aggressive against the homeless in violation of the protection of free speech and unreasonable searches guaranteed in the US Constitution.
ValueClick
allegedly violated consumer protection laws by promising ‘free’ goods that where not actually free.
Cipro
The FDA is seeking to add black box warnings of the risk of tendon rupture associated with Cipro and Levaquin.
The ruptures can involve Achilles tendon, shoulder, hand, bicep or thumb tendons, and is especially increased in patients older than 60, or people who have received kidney, heart or lung transplants, as well as people on steroid therapy...
Mr. Brown Instant Coffee
Possible Melamine Contamination Prompts Canadian Agency to Issue Warning
Clopidogrel Marketed as Plavix FDA Issues Public Health Advisory
Clopidogrel Marketed as Plavix FDA Issues Public Health Advisory

Norton on Public Employee Speech
Public Employee Enjoys Rare First Amendment Retaliation Success
Mt. Healthy Test Does in Public Employee Free Speech Claim
Court Asks For Further Briefing On Praying Employees' Free Exercise Claim
Public employees and the First Amendment right to free speech
9th Cir: Garcetti Poses Mixed Question of Law and Fact







