ADVERTISEMENT



Google       
Call (866) 635-2689 for a free Personal Injury evaluation by attorney in your area.

Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Personal Injury Law Blogs -> Legal Blog

OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense

Find a Local Lawyer

Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402

Bookmark

Personal Injury Law

: Legal Blog

How Distracting is a Cell Phone Really to a Driver? Naturalistic Driving Studies and Driving Simulator Tests Don’t Agree

ADVERTISEMENTS

Naturalistic driving studies that record drivers (through continuous video and kinematic sensors in participants? personal vehicles) in actual driving situations are a scientific method to study driver behavior in real-world driving conditions in the presence of real-world daily pressures. In contrast, a driving simulator is not actual driving - driving simulators engage participants in tracking tasks in a laboratory. Virginia Tech Transportation Institute (VTTI) conducted several large-scale, naturalistic driving studies that continuously observed drivers for more than 6 million miles of driving. While the VTTI study confirmed the tremendous driver distraction associated with text messaging, the results showed much less driver distraction from speaking and listening than driving simulator tests. The following table summarizes the VTTI results:

CELL PHONE TASK                                     RISK OF CRASH OR NEAR CRASH EVENT
Light Vehicle/Cars
Dialing Cell Phone                                       2.8 times as high as non?distracted driving
Talking/Listening to Cell Phone                1.3 times as high as non?distracted driving
Reaching for object                                      1.4 times as high as non?distracted driving
(i.e. electronic device and other) 

Heavy Vehicles/Trucks
Dialing Cell phone                                       5.9 times as high as non?distracted driving
Talking/Listening to Cell Phone                1.0 times as high as non?distracted driving
Use/Reach for electronic device               6.7 times as high as non?distracted driving
Text messaging                                         23.2 times as high as non?distracted driving

The key is keeping your eyes on the road. Text messaging had the longest duration of eyes off road time (4.6 s over a 6-s interval). This equates to a driver traveling the length of a football field at 55 mph without looking at the roadway.

Talking/listening to a cell phone allowed drivers to maintain eyes on the road, were not associated with an increased safety risk to nearly the same degree, and were not nearly as risky as driving while drunk at the legal limit of alcohol. This finding contrasts with data recently pried from the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) showing that drivers talking on their cell phones experience the same potentially deadly distraction whether they are using a handheld device or hands-free technology.  ?True hands?free? phone use, such as voice activated systems, are less risky if they are designed well enough so thE driver does not have to take their eyes off the road often or for long periods.

The VTTI report takes to task recent comparisons made in the literature that it claims greatly exaggerate the cell phone risk relative to the very serious effects of alcohol use. Alcohol use increases the risk of a fatal crash approximately seven times that of sober driving. VTTI argues that, using simple fatal crash and phone use statistics, if talking on cell phones was as risky as driving while drunk, the number of fatal crashes would have increased roughly 50% in the last decade instead of remaining largely unchanged.

One interesting recommendation is to ban all cell phone use by newly licensed teen drivers. The research showed that teens tend to engage in cell phone tasks much more frequently, and in much more risky situations, than adults. The study indicated that teens are four times more likely to get into a related crash or near crash event than their adult counterparts.

The lawyers at Levine & Slavit have decades of experience handling personal injury claims including those involving auto accidents. For over 50 years spanning 3 generations, we have obtained results for satisfied clients. We have offices in Manhattan and Long Island, handling cases in New York City, the Bronx, Brooklyn, Queens and surrounding areas.

If you or someone close to you has been injured in a motor vehicle accident, contact the personal injury lawyers at Levine & Slavit for their help.

To learn more, watch our videos.

Full post as published by Legal Blog on August 03, 2009 (boomark / email).

Bloggers, promote your law blog by nominating your blog for inclusion in USLaw.com's Law Blog Directory and RSS Reader. Benefits described.
Related Law Articles

Lawsuits and Settlements

Related Searches

























































































































US Law
#1 Online Legal Resource













Your Blog Subscriptions
Subscribe to blogs

10,000+ Law Job Listings
Lawyer . Police . Paralegal . Etc
Earn a law-related degree
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.


Practice Area
Zip Code:

Contact a Lawyer Now!






0.0182 secs (new cache)