ADVERTISEMENT



Google       

Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Legal Research Blogs -> Stark County Law Library Blawg

OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense

Find a Local Lawyer

Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402

Bookmark

Legal Research

: Stark County Law Library Blawg

"Recent Ohio Supreme Court Decisions"

ADVERTISEMENTS

Court Rules Crime of Robbery is 'Lesser Included Offense' of Aggravated Robbery

From the site: "2008-0363.  State v. Evans, Slip Opinion No. 2009-Ohio-2974.
Opinion: http://www.supremecourt.ohio.gov/rod/docs/pdf/0/2009/2009-Ohio-2974.pdf

(July 7, 2009) The Supreme Court of Ohio ruled today that the crime of robbery, as defined in R.C. 2911.02(A)(2),  is a "lesser included offense" of the crime of aggravated robbery, as defined it R.C. 2911.01(A)(1).

In a 7-0 decision authored by Justice Terrence O'Donnell, the Court clarified its 1988 ruling in State v. Deem by stating that, in determining whether an offense is a lesser included offense of another, a court must consider (1) whether one offense carries a greater penalty than the other; (2) whether some element of the greater offense is not required to prove commission of the lesser offense; and (3) whether the greater offense as statutorily defined cannot be committed without the lesser offense as statutorily defined also being committed..."

Read full text

 

Robbery and Aggravated Robbery, Armed and Unarmed Assault Are 'Allied Offenses' That Must be Consolidated

From the site: "2007-1812. State v. Harris, Slip Opinion No. 2009-Ohio-3323.
Opinion: http://www.supremecourt.ohio.gov/rod/docs/pdf/0/2009/2009-Ohio-3323.pdf

(July 7, 2009) The Supreme Court of Ohio ruled today that the crime of robbery, as defined in R.C. 2911.02(A)(2),  and aggravated robbery, as defined in R.C. 2911.01(A)(1), are "allied offenses of similar import" and therefore a defendant cannot be convicted of both offenses when both are committed with the same animus (wrongful purpose) against the same victim..." 

Read full text

Full text and active links are available at the source site listed below.

Source: The Supreme Court of Ohio, 7 July 2009

Full post as published by Stark County Law Library Blawg on July 08, 2009 (boomark / email).

Bloggers, promote your law blog by nominating your blog for inclusion in USLaw.com's Law Blog Directory and RSS Reader. Benefits described.
Related Law Articles

Lawsuits and Settlements

Related Searches

























































































































US Law
#1 Online Legal Resource













Your Blog Subscriptions
Subscribe to blogs

10,000+ Law Job Listings
Lawyer . Police . Paralegal . Etc
Earn a law-related degree
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.


Practice Area
Zip Code:

Contact a Lawyer Now!






0.0136 secs (new cache)