Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Education Law Blogs -> Title IX Blog
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Education Law
: Title IX BlogCourt Sides With School District in Cyber-Harassment Case
By Erin Buzuvis, Sudha Setty, and Kristine Newhall
Over the course of ten days in March of 2005, S.S., the plaintiff, a female student then in ninth grade, received three harassing emails that had apparently come from a male classmate, M.X. M.X. used the email account provided by the school to send the emails, and sent them to S.S.'s school-sponsored account. The actual language of the email is included in the opinion, but suffice it to say, they referenced S.S.'s weight, requested that she reveal her private parts to him, and declared his intention to engage in intercourse and other sexual acts with her.
The assistant principal investigated the emails after learning of them though the guidance counselor and the technology director. M.X. denied sending them, suggesting they had been sent from his account by another student to whom he had given his password. Unable to prove that M.X. sent emails (in part because school officials waited too long to check the network systems log, which only stored the relevant information seven days) the school disabled his network account as punishment for sharing his password.
In her lawsuit, S.S. argued that the school's response constituted deliberate indifference to severe and pervasive sexual harassment, a violation of Title IX. Though the court agreed that a jury could find that the district responded with deliberate indifference, it disagreed that the emails were "severe and pervasive." The court compared the emails to "simple acts of teasing" held to be outside the realm of Title IX liability, and contrasted them to cases where school district liability was based on more numerous, frequent incidents of verbal harassment or incidents that involved some offensive physical contact. For similar reason, the court denied S.S.'s constitutional claims as well.
Decision: Saurhaft v. Bd. of Educ., Hastings-on-Hudson Union Free School Dist., 2009 WL 1576467 (S.D.N.Y. June 2, 2009).
Full post as published by Title IX Blog on June 16, 2009 (boomark / email).
Selection of State Supreme Court Judges
How State Court Judges are Selected
Law Enforcement and Criminal Justice Career Choices
Descriptions of law enforcement occupations
Sexual Harassment Policy
Define harassment, outline complaint procedure
The Civil Rights Act of 1871
Law bans discrimination enacted under color of state law
Unlawful Retaliation for Sexual Harassment Claim
Title VII retaliatory discharge retaliation requires proof of participation in protected activities
California Supreme Court Proposition 8 Decision
Court Rejects Challenges to Proposition 8, but Finds Marriages Valid
Student Harassment
Wichita School District pays $45,000 settlement for high school students' harassment lawsuit.
School Racism
School District pays $250,000 in racial harassment settlement.
Rutland School District
Double pay offered as part of class action wage dispute settlement, pending court approval.
Locker Room Hazing
School district to pay $567,500 settlement in harassment lawsuit.
Maintenance Worker
Knox County School District pays employee $24,000 harassment settlement.
Ellsworth School District
4.4% increase in salaries as part of contract settlement.

Missouri Legislature Passes New Law Making Cyber Harassment a Crime
Appeals court sends student harassment case back for trial
High School Student Takes On Anti-Gay HarassmentAnd Wins
In Several States, A Push to Stem Cyber-Bullying: Most of the Laws Focus on Schools







