Consumer Law

Supreme Court Takes Arbitration Case

By Jeff Sovern

The Supreme Court yesterday granted cert in Stolt-Nielsen S.A. v. AnimalFeeds International, which raises the question, according to the SCOTUS Blog, of "when two companies agree to send their disputes to arbitration, may a court order that process to go forward as a class action, if the contract says nothing on that issue."  Because consumer arbitration clauses never provide for class actions, the case might have consequences for consumer contracts which provide for arbitration, but do not expressly bar class actions.  Here is the question presented, as framed in the cert petition:

In Green Tree Financial Corp. v. Bazzle, 539 U.S. 444 (2003), this Court granted certiorari to decide a question that had divided the lower courts: whether the Federal Arbitration Act permits the imposition of class arbitration when the parties? agreement is silent regarding class arbitration. The Court was unable to reach that question, however, because a plurality concluded that the arbitrator first needed to address whether the agreement there was in fact "silent." That threshold obstacle is not present in this case, and the question presented here--which continues to divide the lower courts--is the same one presented in Bazzle

 Whether imposing class arbitration on parties whose arbitration clauses are silent on that issue is consistent with the Federal Arbitration Act, 9 U.S.C. §§ 1 et seq.

Full post as published by CL&P Blog on June 16, 2009 (boomark / email).