Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Real Estate & Property Law Blogs -> inversecondemnation
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Real Estate & Property Law
: inversecondemnationReport On Residency Challenge Appeal: Is Intending To Live Somewhere Enough To Be "Residing" There?
By Robert Thomas (inversecondemnation.com)
In High court ruling on residency requested, the Maui News reports on Dupree v. Hiraga, No. 29464, the appeal of the decision by the State Board of Registration (County of Maui) which concluded that a Maui County councilperson who registered as a Lanai resident is actually a resident of Maui.
Disclosure: we represent the challenger.Attorneys for a Lanai man challenging County Council Member Sol Kaho'ohalahala's claim of Lanai residency are applying for the case to be transferred directly to the Hawaii Supreme Court.
Kaho'ohalahala's appeal of a ruling that he is actually a resident of Lahaina - not Lanai, from which he holds the residency seat on the council - is pending before the Intermediate Court of Appeals. But attorneys for his challenger, Michael "Phoenix" Dupree, said the importance of the case justifies a move to the Supreme Court, and asked for the case to be expedited.
"Whether an individual who is registered as a resident of one district may register in another district and vote in an election merely by declaring that he has an intent to make the new district his residence is an issue of fundamental importance," Dupree's attorneys wrote in court documents.
As noted in the story, we recently applied to the Hawaii Supreme Court for a transfer of the case from the Intermediate Court of Appeals to the Supreme Court, and for expedited consideration pursuant to Haw. Rev. Stat. § 11-52 (1993). Transfer of an appeal from the ICA to the Supreme Court is mandatory if the appeal involves "a question of imperative or fundamental public importance." Transfer is discretionary if it involves "a question of first impression or a novel legal question." Haw. Rev. Stat. § 602-58 (1993). Appeals of residency issues are of great public importance and are subject to speedy resolution under section 11-52, which provides "[w]hen the appeal is perfected, the court shall hear the appeal as soon thereafter as may be reasonable."
More on the appeal here, including the briefs of the parties.
Full post as published by inversecondemnation on June 13, 2009 (boomark / email).
Mitchell Report Summary
Report on Steroid Drug Use in Major League Baseball by Senator George Mitchell
Truth In Lending Act
Consumer Loans and Consumer Credit Protection Act
Philip Morris
Loses Appeal, Will Pay Millions
Institutionalized Medicaid Recipients
Sue For Right To Choose Where They Live
Asbestos Mesothelioma Victim Wins Appeal of $20 Million Asbestos Cancer Verdict
Asbestos Mesothelioma Victim Wins Appeal of $20 Million Asbestos Cancer Verdict
Microsoft Corp.
allegedly failed to provide adequate access and service to Xbox Live and its subscribers.
Bank Website Security
New Report Finds Widespread Flaws
Operating Room Fires
Hundreds Injured During Surgery, New Report Shows

VT- Editorial: Sex offender residency limits offer no security
Oklahoma Enacts Law Including Sex Offender Residency Restrictions
NJ Supreme Court Hears Residency Challenge
Georgia court overturns restrictions on where sex offenders live
Difficulties with Enforcing City Residency Restrictions
Commissioner of Education Issues Primer On Student Residency







