ADVERTISEMENT



Google       

Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Academic Blogs -> Conglomerate

OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense

Find a Local Lawyer

Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402

Bookmark

Academic

: Conglomerate

The SEC Keeps its Promise on Proxy Access?

By Gordon Smith, Christine, Hurt, Vic Fleischer, Fred Tung, Lisa Fairfax, David Zaring

ADVERTISEMENTS

Last year when the SEC decided against adopting a rule that would have allowed shareholders access to the corporation?s proxy statement in order to nominate candidates, SEC Chairman Cox stated that the decision did not signal the end of the proxy access debate. In fact, Cox promised to revisit the issue of proxy access in 2008. Both proponents and opponents of proxy access viewed the promise with skepticism. And their skepticism stemmed from the same issue?that is, the SEC?s failure to adopt a proxy access rule, particularly in light of its decision to embrace a rule permitting corporations to exclude bylaws encompassing procedures for such proposals, seemed to be a pretty definitive statement against proxy access. Moreover, despite increased shareholder activism, it seemed that the political climate at the SEC simply was not conducive to the SEC?s adoption of a proxy access rule. Hence, I think most believed that the SEC would seek to allow the proxy access issue to quietly drift away. And yet, in a recent speech regarding the SEC?s upcoming agenda for 2008, Cox pinpointed proxy access as one of the SEC?s priorities for rulemaking. According to COX, the Division of Corporate Finance would continue its work on the proxy process and would continue to pursue the ?fundamental objective of making the federally-regulated proxy system fit better with the state-authorized rights of shareholders to determine the directors of he companies they own.? To be sure, it is not clear that such a pursuit is the same as the pursuit of proxy access. Nor is it clear that such a pursuit could ever culminate in the adoption of a proxy access rule, particularly given historical and more recent defeats of such a rule. Yet Cox?s statement does suggest that the issue of proxy access in some form will continue to be a part of the governance conversation.

Full post as published by Conglomerate on February 13, 2008 (boomark / email).

Bloggers, promote your law blog by nominating your blog for inclusion in USLaw.com's Law Blog Directory and RSS Reader. Benefits described.
Related Law Articles

Lawsuits and Settlements

Related Searches

























































































































US Law
#1 Online Legal Resource













Your Blog Subscriptions
Subscribe to blogs

10,000+ Law Job Listings
Lawyer . Police . Paralegal . Etc
Earn a law-related degree
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.


Practice Area
Zip Code:

Contact a Lawyer Now!






0.0169 secs (new cache)