ADVERTISEMENT



Google       

Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Intellectual Property Law Blogs -> Seattle Trademark Lawyer

OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense

Find a Local Lawyer

Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402

Bookmark

Intellectual Property Law

: Seattle Trademark Lawyer

Expedia and Hotels.com Sue Priceline.com for False Advertising

By Michael Atkins

ADVERTISEMENTS

On May 20, Bellevue-based Expedia, Inc. and Hotels.com, L.P. filed suit in the Western District against rival travel seller Priceline.com Inc. for false advertising. Plaintiffs claim Priceline.com “makes the unqualified claim that consumers can save ‘half off’ or ‘up to half off’ hotel prices with Priceline compared to Expedia and Hotels.com,” which they allege is false and misleading to consumers.

Plaintiffs assert that Priceline.com offers both a “fixed-price” service in which consumers know the identities of the hotels offered, prices, and availability, as well as a “blind-bidding” service in which consumers do not know the identities of the hotels offered, prices, or availability. Plaintiffs allege Priceline.com’s “blind-bidding” service is the only one that may enable consumers to achieve the advertised savings.

In plaintiffs’ words: “Notwithstanding the material and fundamental differences between Priceline’s ‘fixed-price’ service, and it’s ‘blind-bidding’ service, Priceline deliberately blurs the distinction between its two very different services on its website and in its advertising in order to mislead consumers into believing that they can achieve the advertised savings with any hotel reservation on the Priceline website when in fact the advertised savings are available, if at all, only on Priceline’s ‘blind-bidding’ service. Indeed, because Priceline’s website features both fixed-price and ‘blind-bidding’ services, Priceline’s unqualified price savings claims are false and misleading.”

Priceline.com has not yet answered plaintiffs’ complaint.

Priceline.com’s Web site states: “Priceline’s Name Your Own Price® reservation service is different from fixed-price travel sites like Hotels.com and Expedia.com. With Priceline’s Name Your Own Price® reservation service, the exact hotel is shown only after purchase. Percent savings claim above applies to Name Your Own Price® hotel purchases only and are as compared to the published prices shown on Hotels.com and Expedia.com for the same hotels and the same dates.”

The case cite is Expedia, Inc. v. Priceline.com Inc., No. 09-712 (W.D. Wash.).

Full post as published by Seattle Trademark Lawyer on June 01, 2009 (boomark / email).

Bloggers, promote your law blog by nominating your blog for inclusion in USLaw.com's Law Blog Directory and RSS Reader. Benefits described.
Lawsuits and Settlements

Related Searches

























































































































US Law
#1 Online Legal Resource













Your Blog Subscriptions
Subscribe to blogs

10,000+ Law Job Listings
Lawyer . Police . Paralegal . Etc
Earn a law-related degree
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.


Practice Area
Zip Code:

Contact a Lawyer Now!






0.015 secs (new cache)