Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Health Law Blogs -> Physician Law
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Health Law
: Physician LawOIG Blesses Physician On-Call Compensation Arrangement
By Todd A. Rodriguez
In its recent Advisory Opinion No. 09-05, the OIG reviewed a proposed arrangement whereby a hospital would compensate physicians for on-call services performed on behalf of the hospital's uninsured patients. The OIG concluded that while the Proposed Arrangement could potentially generate prohibited remuneration under the anti-kickback statute, if the requisite intent to induce or reward referrals of Federal health care program business were present, the Office of Inspector General ('OIG') would not impose administrative sanctions on the arrangement.
Under the proposed arrangement, the hospital would pay physicians for services provided during on-call periods to indigent patients. The proposal included four discount payment amounts/categories: (1) Emergency consultations: $100 flat fee; (2) Care of patients admitted as inpatients from the Emergency Department: $300 per admission. (3) Surgical procedure or procedures performed on a patient admitted from the Emergency Department: $350 flat fee; and (4) Endoscopy procedure or procedures performed on a patient admitted from the Emergency Department: $150 flat fee.
The OIG noted that while there is 'substantial risk that improperly structured payments for on-call coverage could be used to disguise unlawful remuneration' under the anti-kickback statute, the proposed arrangement included adequate safeguards against such abuse including:
(1) The payment amounts were represented to be within the range of fair market value for services rendered;
(2) The hospital had a legitimate rationale for revising its on-call coverage policy (physicians were refusing to provide on-call services);
(3) The proposed arrangement would be offered uniformly to all physicians on staff, the method of scheduling on-call coverage would be governed by the hospital's medical staff by-laws, would be uniform within each department or specialty, and would not be used to selectively reward the highest referrers; and
(4) The proposed arrangement would appear to create an equitable mechanism for the hospital to compensate physicians who actually provide care that the Hospital must furnish.
While the Advisory Opinion does not contain any surprises, it provides a very useful analysis at a time when on-call compensation arrangements are proliferating. Physician who have on-call compensation arrangements or who are considering entering into one are well-advised to review their arrangements in light of the OIG's analysis.
Full post as published by Physician Law on May 29, 2009 (boomark / email).
Workers Compensation Overview
Federal laws that cover workplace injuries
Living Wills and Powers of Attorney
Laws effecting the elderly
Hurricane Ike
Gulf Coast Residents Fight for Compensation
State Farm Undercompensation
alleging compensation for totaled vehicles is less than California law requires.
Workers' Compensation
City awards fire inspector $145,000 injury settlement.
Personal Injury Settlement
2 Texas Men Awarded $1.5 Million in Compensation
Worker's Compensation
Lockport to pay $278,220 settlement in insurance lawsuit.
Motorcycle Cop Accident
Erie police officer awarded $150,000 workers compensation settlement after sustaining serious injuries while on duty.

CMS Issues Stark Law Advisory Opinion on Hospital Providing Software Interface to Physicians
CMS Gives Qualified "OK" To Hospital Covering Cost Of Customized EHR Software For Physicians' Use
VC Strine Blesses Accommodation with Dissident Shareholder - But Emphasizes Need for Disclosure
Employees physician permitted to testify at Workers Compensation Law hearing
David Harlow quoted in article on Medicare and telehealth








