ADVERTISEMENT



Google       

Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Labor & Employment Law Blogs -> New York Public Personnel Law

OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense

Find a Local Lawyer

Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402

Bookmark

Labor & Employment Law

: New York Public Personnel Law

Employee?s physician permitted to testify at Workers? Compensation Law hearing

ADVERTISEMENTS

Employee?s physician permitted to testify at Workers? Compensation Law hearing
Matter of Heather D. VanDam v New Paltz Central School District, 46 A.D.3d 1194, Appellate Division, Third Department,

The Workers? Compensation Board affirmed a determination by one of its administrative law judges rejecting the claim of Heather D. VanDam for workers? compensation benefits.

VanDam had attempted to demonstrate that her illnesses were causally related to her work as a teacher for the New Paltz Central School District by offering testimony and related documents by her physician, a licensed and board-certified internist. The Workers? Compensation Law Judge ruled that this evidence could not be considered since VanDam?s physician was not authorized to render medical care under the Workers? Compensation Law.

The Appellate Division reversed the Board?s determination.

Although, said the court, Section 13-b(1) of the Workers? Compensation Law provides that ?no person shall render medical care or conduct independent medical examinations under [the Workers? Compensation Law] without [the] authorization [of] the chair? the provision does not bar evidence from physicians who are not authorized to receive payment for treatment rendered to injured claimants. To bar such testimony ?would impermissively influence the selection of the physician by a workers? compensation claimant ? and would be contrary to the economic and humanitarian objectives of the Workers? Compensation Law.?

While the purpose of Section 13-b(1) is to insure the quality of the medical care and treatment rendered to injured claimants by limiting payment for such medical care and treatment to lawfully qualified persons under the Workers? Compensation Law, the Appellate Division held that ?it does not erect an evidentiary barrier to exclude the testimony and records of a claimant?s physician despite the fact that the physician has not been authorized to receive payments for his or her treatment of workers? compensation claims.?

Full post as published by New York Public Personnel Law on May 20, 2008 (boomark / email).

Bloggers, promote your law blog by nominating your blog for inclusion in USLaw.com's Law Blog Directory and RSS Reader. Benefits described.
Related Law Articles

Lawsuits and Settlements

Related Searches

























































































































US Law
#1 Online Legal Resource













Your Blog Subscriptions
Subscribe to blogs

10,000+ Law Job Listings
Lawyer . Police . Paralegal . Etc
Earn a law-related degree
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.


Practice Area
Zip Code:

Contact a Lawyer Now!






0.0151 secs (new cache)