Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Intellectual Property Law Blogs -> TinytechIP
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Intellectual Property Law
: TinytechIPUS Patent 7328851 - Quantum dot color coding
By blaisemouttet
This patent from Xerox (priority 10/31/2006) includes some broad claims focusing on quantum dots to achieve a multicolor fluorescent glyph for marking items. Claim 1 reads:
1. Machine readable code comprising a set of distinguishable symbols including at least a first symbol for encoding zeroes and a second symbol for encoding ones, wherein the first symbol exhibits a first color during machine reading and the second symbol exhibits a second color during machine reading, wherein the first color and the second color are recognized as different by the machine under machine reading conditions, wherein the first color and the second color are provided by fluorescent marking materials including quantum nanoparticles.
Based on the file history the "novel" feature that the attorney argued was that the marking material was quantum nanoparticles.
Unfortunately there seems to be many pieces of prior art that were overlooked such as:
US Patent 6617583- "A novel encoding system and methods for determining the location and/or identity of a particular item or component of interest is provided. In particular, the present invention utilizes a "barcode" comprising one or more sizes of semiconductor nanocrystals (quantum dots) having characteristic spectral emissions, to either "track" the location of a particular item of interest or to identify a particular item of interest. " (from abstract)
US Patent 6633370-"Quantum dots, semiconductor nanocrystals and semiconductor particles used as fluorescent coding elements" (title)
US Patent 7077329- "Spectral coding by fluorescent semiconductor nanocrystals for document identification and security applications" (title)
Full post as published by TinytechIP on February 12, 2008 (boomark / email).
Zantac Patent
GlaxoSmithKline and Cypress Pharmaceutical settle patent infringement dispute.
Soliris Patent
Alexion Pharmaceuticals Inc. agrees to pay the Oklahoma Medical Research Foundation a $10 million patent infringement settlement.
DRAM Patent
ProMOS Technologies and Mosel Vitelic pay MOSAID Technologies an undisclosed patent infringement settlement.
Sony
to Pay $18.5 Million For Patent Infringment
Qualcomm Settles Patent Suit for $891 Million
The Princeton Review
$2.6 million settlement reached in patent infringement case.

Charles Lawson - Quantum of obviousness in Australian patent laws
Quantum Quahog is now Registered!
US 7,375,802: quantum dots, spooky radar, and StarTrek
Villazor on Blood Quantum Laws
Judges in Conflict â Dismiss for No Rights in the Patent









