ADVERTISEMENT



Google       

Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Intellectual Property Law Blogs -> Threat Level

OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense

Find a Local Lawyer

Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402

Bookmark

Intellectual Property Law

: Threat Level

Jammie Thomas Lawyer: Get Me Off This Case!

By David Kravets

ADVERTISEMENTS

The lawyer for Jammie Thomas is seeking to withdraw from representing his client in the pending retrial of the nation’s only Recording Industry Association of America file sharing case to go to a jury.

Brian Toder told (.pdf) U.S. District Judge Michael Davis of Minnesota that he has billed nearly $130,000 of his own money on the first trial “that will never be recovered, coupled with the likelihood that a similar, additional amount will be incurred if ordered to continue representation of defendant.”

Jammie Thomas testifying during her October, 2007 trial

Jammie Thomas testifying during her October, 2007 trial

A retrial is set for June 15. Judge Davis has not ruled on whether to release Toder from representation.  Both sides could not agree this week to settle the case without a retrial.

“There’s no way another lawyer could try this case by June 15,” Toder said in a telephone interview. The RIAA does not object to Toder’s removal, but opposes a continuance.

The motion to withdraw may indicate lack of confidence that Thomas will prevail in the new trial. Winners of civil suits are often entitled to attorneys fees.

A Duluth jury in 2007 dinged Thomas $222,000 for infringing 24 songs on the Kazaa file sharing program. But months later, Judge Davis declared a mistrial, saying he falsely instructed the jury that copyright infringement amounted to merely making available copyrighted works on a file sharing program -? regardless of whether it was proved anybody else downloaded the content.

Davis ruled it was unclear whether jurors found Thomas liable because she made the songs available or downloaded them from another open share folder. The RIAA, in arguing against a mistrial, said the distinction did not matter because it claimed it proved infringement both ways.

Toder successfully argued that the error was so egregious that a new trial was warranted.

The jury, in assessing the heavy damages award, found that Thomas turned over a different hard drive than the one the RIAA detected was used to infringe musical copyrights.

The RIAA has sued more than 30,000 individuals on accusations of copyright infringement. Most have settled out of court for a few thousand dollars.

See Also:


Full post as published by Threat Level on May 15, 2009 (boomark / email).

Bloggers, promote your law blog by nominating your blog for inclusion in USLaw.com's Law Blog Directory and RSS Reader. Benefits described.
Related Law Articles

Lawsuits and Settlements

Related Searches

























































































































US Law
#1 Online Legal Resource













Your Blog Subscriptions
Subscribe to blogs

10,000+ Law Job Listings
Lawyer . Police . Paralegal . Etc
Earn a law-related degree
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.


Practice Area
Zip Code:

Contact a Lawyer Now!






0.023 secs (new cache)