Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Legal Research Blogs -> FSU College of Law Library Blog
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Legal Research
: FSU College of Law Library BlogEvaluation and Validation of Election-Related Equipment, Standards and Testing
By jlutz99
The EVEREST: Evaluation and Validation of Election-Related Equipment, Standards and Testing: Final Report has been released. This is an Ohio study released by the Ohio Secretary of State and prepared by teams from Pennsylvania State University, the University of Pennsylvania and WebWise Security. Excerpt of conclusions:
- Insufficient Security - The systems uniformly failed to adequately address important threats against election data and processes. Central among these is a failure to adequately defend an election from insiders, to prevent virally infected software from compromising entire precincts and counties, and to ensure cast votes are appropriately protected and accurately counted.
- Improper Use or Implementation of Security Technology - A root cause of the failures present in the studied systems is the pervasive mis-application of security technology. Failure to follow standard and well-known practices for the use of cryptography, key and password management, and security hardware seriously undermine the protections provided. In several important cases, the misapplication of commonly accepted principles renders the security technology of no use whatsoever.
- Auditing - All of the systems exhibited a visible lack of trustworthy auditing capability. In all systems, the logs of election practices were commonly forgeable or erasable by the principals who they were intended to be monitoring. The impact of the lack of secure auditing is that it is difficult to know when an attack occurs, or to know how to isolate or recover from it when it is detected.
- Software Maintenance - The software maintenance practices of the studied systems are deeply flawed. This has led to fragile software in which exploitable crashes, lockups, and failures are common in normal use. Such software instability is likely to increase over time, and may lead to highly insecure and unreliable elections.
Read the Report here.
Posted by Jon Lutz
Full post as published by FSU College of Law Library Blog on December 18, 2007 (boomark / email).
Diving Equipment Recalled by Dive Rite
Diving Equipment Recalled by Dive Rite
Wells Fargo and Rels Valuation
Face Home Evaluation Class Action
Ballot Device
Election Systems and Software agrees to pays city of San Francisco $3.5 million settlement after problems with AutoMARK lead to prolonged hand counting of votes.
Football-Related Dementia and Workers' Compensation
Football-Related Dementia Is the NFL Liable?
Tuberculosis Testing:
False Positives
Dirty Needles
Prompt HIV, Hepatitis Testing in Alberta

"2008 National Voting Equipment Report"
New form: request for validation letter
Predictions of "an election day mess"
Recycling "Single Use" Medical Equipment: Common Practice
State Board of Elections to Release Funds for New Voting Equipment
Iowa Workers' Compensation - PERC - Part VIII - Drycleaning Wearing the Right Protective Equipment









