ADVERTISEMENT



Google       

Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Legal News Blogs -> Lawbeat

OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense

Find a Local Lawyer

Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402

Bookmark

Legal News

: Lawbeat

In Lackey story, an opportunity lost

By Mark Obbie

ADVERTISEMENTS
It is almost unheard of that an acquittal receives more media attention than the case that predicated it. But this is the case for Dan Lackey, a developmentally disabled man who was wrongly accused and convicted of sexually assaulting a woman in 2003. Lackey spent 3 and a half years in prison before the judge overturned the judgment in the case altogether. The Syracuse Post-Standard covered the Lackey acquittal extensively.  In this article, staff reporter Jim O'Hara gives an in-depth, play-by-play look at the circumstances that led to Lackey's wrongful conviction. The story is a heart-wrenching one, to be sure; it's fit for the big screen, or at least a made-for-TV Lifetime docudrama. All of the classic characters are here: the unwitting idiot duped by a legal system hungrier for a conviction than actual justice, the unbelieving parents who fought in defense long after Lackey was put behind bars, and even the mentally troubled woman who claimed to be assaulted and recanted her testimony years later. O'Hara vividly paints the thoughts and actions of these characters one by one in this long-form piece. While O'Hara's attention towards detail is commendable, this particular story lacks one essential element: a focused analysis of the court system itself, or of the underlying flaws that were responsible for Lackey's wrongful conviction. O'Hara's piece does much to incite the ire of the reader -- how, in this day and age, could a person so obviously innocent spend 3 and a half years of his life behind bars -- it fails to even attempt to answer this question, or to examine the larger cultural context that the case operates within.  Lackey's case is sympathetic enough not to need overly descriptive editorial injected into the plotline. By pandering to the dramatic elements of the case while simultaneously failing to examine the legal underpinnings of the Lackey trial, O'Hara misses a valuable chance to educate an audience that might not otherwise have any interest in the field of wrongful convictions and the lives they often ruin.-- Brenna Cammeron

Full post as published by Lawbeat on April 23, 2009 (boomark / email).

Bloggers, promote your law blog by nominating your blog for inclusion in USLaw.com's Law Blog Directory and RSS Reader. Benefits described.
Lawsuits and Settlements

Related Searches

























































































































US Law
#1 Online Legal Resource













Your Blog Subscriptions
Subscribe to blogs

10,000+ Law Job Listings
Lawyer . Police . Paralegal . Etc
Earn a law-related degree
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.


Practice Area
Zip Code:

Contact a Lawyer Now!






0.0146 secs (new cache)