Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Patent Law Blogs -> Philip Brooks’ Patent Infringement Updates
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Patent Law
: Philip Brooks’ Patent Infringement UpdatesEnforcing Intellectual Property at the U.S. International Trade Commission
By Philip Brooks
The American Bar Association is hosting the above-titled teleconference and live audio webcast program on May 5, 2009.
The U.S. International Trade Commission is increasingly the forum of choice for litigation directed against importers and distributors of products that infringe U.S. patents, trademarks, copyrights, or that are otherwise somehow tainted by unfair methods of competition. These cases (so-called ?Section 337 cases?) are so popular because:
- they are much faster and less expensive than comparable court cases (even in ?rocket dockets?);
- they are tried to experienced Administrative Law Judges who handle these cases exclusively;
- an ITC Staff attorney is involved in every case to assure that private parties have access to assistance if they need it;
- injunctive relief is automatically granted if the complaining party wins;
- U.S. Customs and Border Protection automatically excludes any further importations of goods found to infringe ? at no cost to and without further involvement by the complaining party;
- any company conducting legitimate activities in the U.S. that is the victim of unfair trade practices from abroad can bring a Section 337 case, regardless of it country of origin (Section 337 cases have been brought by companies based in virtually every industrialized country in the world);
- accused infringers cannot avoid the ITC?s in rem jurisdiction once their products have entered into the U.S.;
- and relief is automatically awarded against defaulters.
Faculty
Thomas Fusco, U.S. International Trade Commission
Marylee Jenkins (Moderator), Arent Fox, LLP
Ralph Mittleberger, Arent Fox, LLP
More details and registration are available here.
Full post as published by Philip Brooks’ Patent Infringement Updates on April 17, 2009 (boomark / email).
Nanotechnology Law
Intellectual property laws
Trade Secrets
Former execs are hit with doctrine of inevitable disclosure.
Dumb Foreign Laws
Stupid Laws of Other Countries
Compellent, Storage Engine, et. al.
$10.5 million settlement reached in intellectual property dispute.
General Electric Co. and SABIC Innovative Plastics
$3 million settlement reached in intellectual property dispute.
Trade Secrets
Razorsight agreed to pay $4.5 million settlement in infringement lawsuit.
Newspaper Publisher
Star Tribune must pay St. Paul Pioneer Press a $3.8 million trade secrets act violations settlement.
AT&T International Roaming Charges, AT&T lawsuit
AT&T Faces International Roaming Charges Lawsuit
Preliminary Settlement Reached With Soleus International
Soleus International Reaches Preliminary Settlement of Class Action

Governments, Financial Stakeholders Meet On Policy For IP As Collateral
Dinwoodie on International Intellectual Property
TRIPS May Evolve To Keep Pace With Modern IP Concerns
Using Litigation to Understand Trade Secrets
Intellectual Property And Access Can Co-Exist, US Rightsholders Say
UNCITRAL Begins Debate On Harmonising Secured Financing, IP Laws








