Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Personal Injury Law Blogs -> Charlottesville Personal Injury Lawyer
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Personal Injury Law
: Charlottesville Personal Injury LawyerMedical Device Bill To Be Introduced Following Recent Supreme Court Decision
By Greg Webb
Democrats in Congress are moving to overturn a Supreme Court decision that allowed medical device manufacturers to be shielded from lawsuits after the Supreme Court Justices recently decided drug makers should not receive the same protection. Last Wednesday, the Court ruled against Wyeth's contention that it should not be subject to lawsuits in state courts for Phenergan, its anti-nausea drug, because the Food and Drug Administration (FDA)approved the medication. This ruling upheld a $6.7 million award to a Vermont woman who lost her arm when she was improperly injected with Phenergan.
Seizing the opportunity introduced by the Court's decision, Democrats reintroduced the Medical Device Safety Act, which would allow similar lawsuits against companies that manufacture heart devices, replacement hips, catheters and other apparatuses. The medical device lobbying group quickly criticized the act, claiming it would impede medical innovation, create more lawsuits and result in higher health care costs for all Americans. However, many interest groups, including the AARP, trial lawyers and consumer advocates, support the bill. Many analysts believe this measure will soon become a law.
Let there be no mistake, this is a good bill and it needs to be passed. No one, absolutely no one, including corporations, should be immune from being held accountable for wrongful conduct, including negligence. For years the medical device manufacturers and pharmaceutical companies, among many other large business industries, have been seeking immunity from lawsuits. Some of them achieved partial victories during the last presidential administration through back-door preemption regulations via federal agencies. It looks as if the Obama Administration (and Congress) is proceeding on a more consumer-oriented track, looking out for the little guy. Hopefully, this philosophy will continue.
Originally posted at InjuryBoard by Greg WebbFull post as published by Charlottesville Personal Injury Lawyer on March 31, 2009 (boomark / email).
California Supreme Court Proposition 8 Decision
Court Rejects Challenges to Proposition 8, but Finds Marriages Valid
Selection of State Supreme Court Judges
How State Court Judges are Selected
Is Barack Obama a Natural Born Citizen?
Wrotnowski v. Bysiewicz (Supreme Court): Does Obama meet the constitutional requirements to be President
Unwed Fathers' Rights in Adoption
Landmark Cases in Adoption Law Shape Law with respect to Unwed Fathers
Transportation Equity Act for the 21st Century
TEA-21 - Plus Law 105-178
Law Enforcement and Criminal Justice Career Choices
Descriptions of law enforcement occupations
Patent Infringement
Cardia agrees to pay $2.25 million settlement in medical device lawsuit.
Phone Bill Reduction
Qwest agrees to $16 million settlement in overcharging lawsuit.
Medtronic CD Horizon
allegedly recalled as defective device for being prone to failure, shearing and cable breaks.
Ebay Fined
French Court Sets Fine at $61 Million
Personal Injury
Appeals Court Upholds Congressional Legislation
Ballot Device
Election Systems and Software agrees to pays city of San Francisco $3.5 million settlement after problems with AutoMARK lead to prolonged hand counting of votes.

Lawmakers Push Forward with Medical Device Bill
Nothings Knee-Jerk About The Importance of Passing The Medical Device Act
Wisconsin Court Dismissed Medical Device Lawsuit
Supreme Court Medical Device Manufacturers
Medical Device Lawsuits Limited
Congress Pushes to Nullify Medical Device Decision








