Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Intellectual Property Law Blogs -> IP Spotlight
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Intellectual Property Law
: IP SpotlightFederal Circuit largely backs USPTO limits on patent claims and RCEs; strikes down limits on continuations
By Jim Singer

Full post as published by IP Spotlight on March 22, 2009 (boomark / email).
Paxil Lawsuit
Paxil Claims, Lawsuits, and Injuries
Privacy Protection Act 42 USC 21A
Federal Newsroom Law
Federal Adoption Tax Credit
Financial Incentive for Adoptive Parents
Transportation Equity Act for the 21st Century
TEA-21 - Plus Law 105-178
Specialty Lamp International
Recalls Counterfeit Circuit Breakers
Zantac Patent
GlaxoSmithKline and Cypress Pharmaceutical settle patent infringement dispute.
Soliris Patent
Alexion Pharmaceuticals Inc. agrees to pay the Oklahoma Medical Research Foundation a $10 million patent infringement settlement.
DRAM Patent
ProMOS Technologies and Mosel Vitelic pay MOSAID Technologies an undisclosed patent infringement settlement.
False Claims
Attorney Robert Arledge ordered to pay $5.8 million after making false Fen Phen settlement claims.
LINA - Cigna Life Insurance Company of North America Disability Claims
LINA Insurance alleging violations of disability insurance claims.

TAFAS v. DUDAS: PTO Asks CAFC To Allow Office to Implement Limits on Continuations and Claims
Examination Support Document (ESD) COuld Add $26,000 to Patent Costs
The dominance of RCE's and the Lemley/Moore conjecture
Tafas v. Doll: Continuation Limits Invalid; Limits on Claims and RCEs are OK
The Little Shop of Patent and Trademark Horrors.







