ADVERTISEMENT



Google       

Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Trademark Law Blogs -> Las Vegas Trademark Attorney

OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense

Find a Local Lawyer

Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402

Bookmark

Trademark Law

: Las Vegas Trademark Attorney

Rosetta Stone Announces Settlement of Search Engine Keyword Trademark Infringement Lawsuit

By Ryan Gile

ADVERTISEMENTS


A blogging two-for-Tuesday . . .

I previously wrote (link here) about the trademark infringement lawsuit filed last year by Rosetta Stone Ltd. (?Rosetta Stone?), the publisher of the Rosetta Stone line of interactive computer software for learning foreign languages, against two New Zealand companies, Rocket Languages Ltd. and Libros Media Ltd. (together ?Rocket?) along with two specifically named individuals (Ishmael Lopez and Matthew Weidner) who each operated various ?language review? websites (through which they supposedly were paid a 75% commission by Rocket for every Rocket Languages product sold through their websites) and who made the unfortunate mistake of promoting their websites by purchasing ?Rosetta Stone? as advertising keywords in Google's AdWords program and Yahoo's Marketing Solutions program.

Rosetta Stone issued a press release today proclaiming victory in this particular lawsuit by announcing that it had ?successfully settled? its trademark infringement lawsuit against Ishmael Lopez and Matthew Weidner.

Under the terms of settlement, Lopez and Weidner will ?each cease using Rosetta Stone trademarks in online paid search advertising campaigns and on their online websites and operations.? The press release also notes that Lopez and Weidner ?will provide Rosetta Stone with monetary compensation.? In other words, Lopez and Weidner will stop purchasing the Rosetta Stone name as a keyword and Rosetta Stone was able to get some money out of them to pay its attorneys fees.

Not surprisingly, Rosetta Stone is painting this as a large victory against ?the illegal use of Rosetta Stone?s trademarks and confusingly similar variations as keywords in search engine advertising programs and in the header and text of the resulting sponsored links.?

Or perhaps it?s just another case where it simply did not make economic sense for these two guys to fight a legal battle against a large company like Rosetta Stone in order to continue using Rosetta Stone?s trademarks as keywords.

Full post as published by Las Vegas Trademark Attorney on March 10, 2009 (boomark / email).

Bloggers, promote your law blog by nominating your blog for inclusion in USLaw.com's Law Blog Directory and RSS Reader. Benefits described.
Related Law Articles

Lawsuits and Settlements

Related Searches

























































































































US Law
#1 Online Legal Resource













Your Blog Subscriptions
Subscribe to blogs

10,000+ Law Job Listings
Lawyer . Police . Paralegal . Etc
Earn a law-related degree
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.


Practice Area
Zip Code:

Contact a Lawyer Now!






0.0259 secs (new cache)