ADVERTISEMENT



Google       
Call (866) 635-2689 for a free Personal Injury evaluation by attorney in your area.

Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Personal Injury Law Blogs -> Boston Injury Lawyer Blog

OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense

Find a Local Lawyer

Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402

Bookmark

Personal Injury Law

: Boston Injury Lawyer Blog

US Supreme Court Upholds $6.7 Drug Litigation Verdict Against Wyeth Pharmaceuticals and Rejects Plea that Federal Approval of Phenergan Pre-Empts Personal Injury Lawsuits

By Altman & Altman

ADVERTISEMENTS

The US Supreme Court has upheld a $6.7 million civil awarded to a woman whose arm had to be amputated after receiving a botched injection of Phenergan, an anti-nausea medication. The woman, Diane Levin, was injured in April 2000 when she went to a local clinic for treatment of a migraine.

The clinic administered the drug, also known as promethazine, to her using an IV-push, which allows for a greater volume of medication to enter her body at a faster pace. Although the needle was supposed to go straight into her vein, it accidentally struck her artery and Levine developed gangrene.

Doctors had to amputate her hand and forearm, which put an end to Levin?s career as a guitarist and a pianist. Not only did she lose a main source of financial livelihood but she began to accrue expensive medical bills. Levin sued Wyeth Pharmaceuticals, accusing the company of insufficient product labeling. She contended that the drug maker did not provide enough warning about the potential dangers of using the drug.

After a civil jury ruled in her favor, Wyeth Pharmaceuticals appealed the verdict. The drug maker has argued that because the Food and Drug Administration approved Phenergan for consumer use, this should pre-empt any dangerous drug lawsuits against it.

However, the Supreme Court, with its 6-3 decision, rejected the drug maker?s claim that Wyeth did not have the right to sue the company and gave Levin the right to collect her jury award. In writing for the majority, Justice John Paul Stevens said it was possible for Wyeth to comply with both federal and state laws in this matter.

This ruling is considered a victory not just for Wyeth but for other injury plaintiffs who wish to sue pharmaceutical companies over dangerous drugs that have caused personal injury or wrongful death.

Musician gets high court OK to sue Wyeth, CNNMoney.com, March 4, 2009

No Legal Shield in Drug Labeling, Justices Rule, New York Times, March 4, 2009


Related Web Resources:
Wyeth V. Levine, Supreme Court Opinion (PDF)

Wyeth Pharmaceuticals

Wyeth Comments on U.S. Supreme Court Ruling in Levine Preemption Case, Wyeth, March 4, 2009

Full post as published by Boston Injury Lawyer Blog on March 05, 2009 (boomark / email).

Bloggers, promote your law blog by nominating your blog for inclusion in USLaw.com's Law Blog Directory and RSS Reader. Benefits described.
Related Law Articles

Lawsuits and Settlements

Related Searches

























































































































US Law
#1 Online Legal Resource













Your Blog Subscriptions
Subscribe to blogs

10,000+ Law Job Listings
Lawyer . Police . Paralegal . Etc
Earn a law-related degree
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.


Practice Area
Zip Code:

Contact a Lawyer Now!






0.0203 secs (new cache)