Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Personal Injury Law Blogs -> Boston Injury Lawyer Blog
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Personal Injury Law
: Boston Injury Lawyer BlogUS Supreme Court Upholds $6.7 Drug Litigation Verdict Against Wyeth Pharmaceuticals and Rejects Plea that Federal Approval of Phenergan Pre-Empts Personal Injury Lawsuits
By Altman & Altman
The US Supreme Court has upheld a $6.7 million civil awarded to a woman whose arm had to be amputated after receiving a botched injection of Phenergan, an anti-nausea medication. The woman, Diane Levin, was injured in April 2000 when she went to a local clinic for treatment of a migraine.
The clinic administered the drug, also known as promethazine, to her using an IV-push, which allows for a greater volume of medication to enter her body at a faster pace. Although the needle was supposed to go straight into her vein, it accidentally struck her artery and Levine developed gangrene.
Doctors had to amputate her hand and forearm, which put an end to Levin?s career as a guitarist and a pianist. Not only did she lose a main source of financial livelihood but she began to accrue expensive medical bills. Levin sued Wyeth Pharmaceuticals, accusing the company of insufficient product labeling. She contended that the drug maker did not provide enough warning about the potential dangers of using the drug.
After a civil jury ruled in her favor, Wyeth Pharmaceuticals appealed the verdict. The drug maker has argued that because the Food and Drug Administration approved Phenergan for consumer use, this should pre-empt any dangerous drug lawsuits against it.
However, the Supreme Court, with its 6-3 decision, rejected the drug maker?s claim that Wyeth did not have the right to sue the company and gave Levin the right to collect her jury award. In writing for the majority, Justice John Paul Stevens said it was possible for Wyeth to comply with both federal and state laws in this matter.
This ruling is considered a victory not just for Wyeth but for other injury plaintiffs who wish to sue pharmaceutical companies over dangerous drugs that have caused personal injury or wrongful death.
Musician gets high court OK to sue Wyeth, CNNMoney.com, March 4, 2009
No Legal Shield in Drug Labeling, Justices Rule, New York Times, March 4, 2009
Related Web Resources:
Wyeth V. Levine, Supreme Court Opinion (PDF)
Wyeth Comments on U.S. Supreme Court Ruling in Levine Preemption Case, Wyeth, March 4, 2009
Full post as published by Boston Injury Lawyer Blog on March 05, 2009 (boomark / email).
Mesothelioma Law Suit
Asbestos Exposure
Selection of State Supreme Court Judges
How State Court Judges are Selected
Vioxx Lawsuits
Vioxx personal injury suits are a seroius concern for Merck and patietns
California Supreme Court Proposition 8 Decision
Court Rejects Challenges to Proposition 8, but Finds Marriages Valid
Is Barack Obama a Natural Born Citizen?
Wrotnowski v. Bysiewicz (Supreme Court): Does Obama meet the constitutional requirements to be President
Construction Site Accidents
Lawsuits related to accidents
Personal Injury
Appeals Court Upholds Congressional Legislation
Wyeth Sued Over Rapamune Transplant Drug
Illegal Marketing of Rapamune Sparks Lawsuit
National Association of Realtors
Settlement reached in broker listing antitrust lawsuit, pending court approval.
Missouri Attorney General's Office
$26,000 settlement reached in disability discrimination lawsuit, pending court approval.
Rutland School District
Double pay offered as part of class action wage dispute settlement, pending court approval.
Anzemet Pricing
Aventis Pharmaceuticals Inc. agrees to $22.7 million settlement for inflating drug prices.

Supreme Court Set to Review Verdict Against Drug Maker
United States Supreme Court to Hear Federal Preemption Case Today
Supreme Court to hear potential policy-changing product liability lawsuit
Big Pharma, FDA and Preemption: Who should be held liable








