Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Academic Blogs -> Legal Theory Blog
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Academic
: Legal Theory BlogWeber & Neuhoff on Carbon Markets & Innovation
By Lawrence Solum
Thomas A. Weber and Karsten Neuhoff (Stanford University - Management Science & Engineering and University of Cambridge - Department of Applied Economics) has posted Carbon Markets and Technological Innovation on SSRN. Here is the abstract:
This paper examines the effects of firm-level innovation in carbon-abatement technologies on optimal cap-and-trade schemes with and without price controls. We characterize optimal cap-and-trade regulation with price cap and price floor, and compare it to the special cases of pure taxation and simple emissions cap. Innovation shifts the tradeoff between price- and quantity-based instruments towards quantity-based emissions trading schemes. More specifically, an increase in innovation effectiveness lowers the optimal emissions cap, and leads to relaxed price controls unless the marginal environmental damage cost is small. Because of the decrease in the emissions cap, innovation in abatement technologies can lead to a higher expected carbon price, so as to provide sufficient incentives for private R&D investments. The expected carbon price decreases once innovative technologies are widely used.
Full post as published by Legal Theory Blog on February 05, 2009 (boomark / email).
Smoke and Carbon Monoxide Alarm Failure
Mobile Homes
Risk for Carbon Monoxide Poisoning
Continental Carbon
Settles with Landowners in Pollution Suit
Robert Fresh Markets Win $21.6 Million Insurance Lawsuit
Robert Fresh Groceries Wins $21.6 Million Katrina Insurance Lawsuit

Everything You Always Wanted To Know About China's Carbon Markets.
Innovation Markets after Genzyme/Novazyme
Voluntary Carbon Markets Assessment
Competition and Innovation Policy
Antitrust in Wonderland: Regulating Markets of Innovation








