ADVERTISEMENT



Google       

Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Kentucky Blogs -> Kentucky Cases

OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense

Find a Local Lawyer

Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402

Bookmark

Kentucky

: Kentucky Cases

Criminal: Sexual conduct with child -- Everett Jenkins v. Com. of Kentucky (COA 12/19/2008)

By Michael Stevens

ADVERTISEMENTS

Everett Jenkins v. Com. of Kentucky
Criminal:  Sexual conduct with child
2007-CA-001268
PUBLISHED: REVERSING AND REMANDING
PANEL: STUMBO PRESIDING; LAMBERT, THOMPSON CONCUR
JEFFERSON (JUDGE MCCAY CHAUVIN)
DATE RENDERED: 12/19/2008

Opinion by Judge Stumbo; Judges Lambert and Thompson concurred. The Court reversed, and remanded for a new trial, a final judgment and sentencing in which appellant received 12 years? imprisonment for the use of a minor in a sexual performance. The Court first held that appellant was not entitled to a directed verdict. The evidence that appellant put a dog toy down the underwear of the child, held the child down and watched the dog get the toy out, and that either the dog toy or the dog?s mouth touched the genitals of the child comported with KRS 531.300(4)(b), which required physical contact with the genitals of a minor. The Court then held that while evidence about inappropriate touching; sexual comments made to the children; a trip to a strip club that resulted in a phone call to one of the children; and the placing of a sex toy in a child?s room was relevant to establish intent and motive, testimony of sex toys in the house, general trips to strip clubs and marijuana use were impermissibly entered to establish bad character in violation of KRE 404(b). The Court next held that the trial court did not err in failing to give an instruction on attempted use of a minor in a sexual performance when appellant denied the alleged conduct and the only other evidence showed that the act was completed. The Court finally held that the trial court erred when it allowed more than one victim impact statement in violation of KRS 532.055. However, the issue on retrial was moot as KRS 532.055 was amended to allow for multiple victims to give impact statements.

Digest from COA Monthly Summaries - Dec. 2008 

Full post as published by Kentucky Cases on January 28, 2009 (boomark / email).

Bloggers, promote your law blog by nominating your blog for inclusion in USLaw.com's Law Blog Directory and RSS Reader. Benefits described.
Related Law Articles

Lawsuits and Settlements

Related Searches

























































































































US Law
#1 Online Legal Resource













Your Blog Subscriptions
Subscribe to blogs

10,000+ Law Job Listings
Lawyer . Police . Paralegal . Etc
Earn a law-related degree
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.


Practice Area
Zip Code:

Contact a Lawyer Now!






0.0131 secs (new cache)