Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Copyright Law Blogs -> Recording Industry vs The People
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Copyright Law
: Recording Industry vs The PeopleOral argument in Capitol Records v. MP3Tunes now available online
By Ty Rogers and Ray Beckerman
Oral argument of EMI's motion to dismiss counterclaims in Capitol Records v. MP3Tunes.com, Inc. took place on January 16, 2009.
EMI argued that since MP3Tunes did not comply with the DMCA notices it contends were improper, it sustained no damages.
The argument started off with the following exchange:
THE COURT: Do you agree that if the plaintiffs distribute music for free on the Internet, your client distributes music for free on the Internet, the fact that those songs are somewhere on MP3tunes Web sites' is not infringement?A copy of the transcript is now available online.MR. BART: I think it still is infringement.
Oral argument of plaintiffs' motion to dismiss counterclaims, January 16, 2009
Keywords: lawyer digital copyright law online internet law legal download upload peer to peer p2p file sharing filesharing music movies indie independent label freeculture creative commons pop/rock artists riaa independent mp3 cd favorite songs intellectual property portable music player
Full post as published by Recording Industry vs The People on January 28, 2009 (boomark / email).
Online Ticket Vendor
Buying Tickets Online That Never Arrive
Medical Records
To Stay out of Pharma's Hands
Oral HRT
More Than Doubles the Risk of Blood Clots
Blood Clots
Associated with Oral Contraceptives Yaz and Yasmin
Kimkins
alleging false advertising of online dieting.
Generic Versions
Barr Pharmaceuticals to pay $5.9 million settlement for blocking the sale of oral contraceptives.

Jamendo and MP3tunes: Free music for free lockers
Audio of Oral Arguments before First Circuit Now Available
Oral Argument in Arizona v. Johnson:








