Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Family Law Blogs -> California Divorce Blawg
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Family Law
: California Divorce BlawgU.S. Supreme Court Issues Family Law Ruling Regarding Pensions
By John E. Harding, JD, CFLS
The U.S. Supreme Court has issued a unanimous decision in a pension case that pitted an ex-wife against the pensioner's daughter.
Mr. Kennedy (the pensioner) was an employee of DuPont and participated in their savings and investment plan (SIP) that was an ERISA benefit plan. In 1971, Mr. Kennedy married and three years later signed a beneficiary designation identifying his new wife, Liv Kennedy, as the sole beneficiary of the SIP plan. Twenty years later, the couple divorced. As part of the divorce, the ex-wife agreed to relinquish all rights to husband???s pension benefits with DuPont. The agreement to waive those benefit was contained in the divorce decree. However, a Qualified Domestic Relations Order was not submitted covering these benefits nor did the husband ever change the beneficiary designation for the account.
In 1998, Mr. Kennedy retired from DuPont and later died in 2001. His daughter was appointed administrator of his estate. She sent a letter to DuPont requesting the Estate be paid the funds in the SIP. DuPont refused, stating that the beneficiary designation identified the ex-wife as the beneficiary. She also asked the ex-wife (her Mom) to relinquish her rights to the account and she refused. In fact, ex-wife asked DuPont to pay up and they sent the ex-wife the $400,000.00. Daughter, on behalf of the Estate, brought a lawsuit.
The United States Supreme Court said that a QDRO was not needed to eliminate a person's right to a benefit plan. Rather, the key was the beneficiary designation form and the procedures set up under the plan. The plan set up a procedure for the husband to designate a new beneficiary and he did not. The plan also set up a procedure for the ex-wife to waive her right to benefits, and she did not. Therefore, the employer had to pay the benefits as stated in the original beneficiary designation form no matter what the divorce decree stated. Thus, ex-wife gets the benefits and daughter does not.
What is the lesson learned? If you divorce, you must ensure that your designated beneficiary forms under any pension and/or retirement plan covered by ERISA are changed. You must make the change yourself following the rules given by your employer. Do not rely on a waiver of benefits in a divorce decree or QDRO. Change the beneficiary form or it could result in unintended consequences at your death--your ex-spouse getting your benefits.
Please click here for the entirety of a great article by Robert M. Kisselburgh on his Mississippi Family Law Blog.
Please be sure to visit www.hardinglaw.com, the website for the law firm of Harding & Associates, for more information on California family law.
Full post as published by California Divorce Blawg on January 27, 2009 (boomark / email).
Selection of State Supreme Court Judges
How State Court Judges are Selected
California Supreme Court Proposition 8 Decision
Court Rejects Challenges to Proposition 8, but Finds Marriages Valid
Is Barack Obama a Natural Born Citizen?
Wrotnowski v. Bysiewicz (Supreme Court): Does Obama meet the constitutional requirements to be President
Unwed Fathers' Rights in Adoption
Landmark Cases in Adoption Law Shape Law with respect to Unwed Fathers
Law Enforcement and Criminal Justice Career Choices
Descriptions of law enforcement occupations
Heart of Atlanta v United States
Supreme Court Decision: Civil Rights Act Protected by Interstate Commerce Clause
Katrina Victims See Justice, Ruling Paves the Way for Class Actions
Katrina Victims See Justice Ruling Paves the Way for Class Actions
Ebay Fined
French Court Sets Fine at $61 Million
Personal Injury
Appeals Court Upholds Congressional Legislation
Family of Car Accident Awarded $35 Million
Family of Car Accident Awarded $35 Million
Tomato Salmonella
Sheetz Convenience Stores agrees to confidential out-of-court settlement with food poisoning victim.
National Association of Realtors
Settlement reached in broker listing antitrust lawsuit, pending court approval.

Supreme Court Issues Worker Retaliation Ruling
Gihilarducci on Defined Benefit Pensions are Dead; Long Live DB Pensions
"Court weighs how maternity leaves affect pensions"
"Modern Departures from the Supreme Court: Party, Pensions, or Power."
Supreme Court Heard Arguments Yesterday in AT&T v. Hulteen
Gurkhas lose High Court battle over pensions









