Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Legal News Blogs -> Law Blog - WSJ.com
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Legal News
: Law Blog - WSJ.comNo Whistlin? Dixie: In Confederate Flag Case, Students Denied Review
By Dan Slater
Remember that controversial Confederate flag case from Tennessee?
The recap: A high school principal in Tennessee told students they couldn’t have “Rebel flags” or symbols of flags on their clothes. Three students, who felt that the policy unconstitutionally interfered with their ability to express their southern heritage, sued. In August, the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals upheld a grant of summary judgment in favor of the school.
The court cited testimony that racial tensions — including racist and threatening graffiti and physical altercations between African-American and white students — comprised the context for the clothing ban. The court distinguished the case from Tinker v. Des Moines Ind. Comm School, the landmark First Amendment case that struck down a school ban on armbands to protest the Vietnam War.
Today, the Sixth Circuit denied the students’ petition for rehearing en banc.
In dissent, Judge Danny Boggs wrote:
-
It should be emphasized that no disruption of any sort was directly associated with the display of symbols, in that the persons displaying the symbols are not alleged to have been involved in any physical incidents, nor to have instigated even any verbal ones. . . Consider also that one of the plaintiffs to this case, who was involved in a verbal confrontation with another student, testified that after he was called a “dumb redneck,” he did not respond because “it’s not worth my time beating somebody’s butt because they’re just acting stupid.” . . . Though a confrontation short of a violent altercation could amount to a disruption within the meaning of Tinker, not every disagreement or incident of name-calling will support the suppression of speech. And it should be left to a jury to determine whether this disagreement both constitutes a disruption and was sufficiently related
to the Confederate flag to justify a ban.
Full post as published by Law Blog - WSJ.com on January 23, 2009 (boomark / email).
Dixie National Life Insurance
to Pay $7.8 Million In Medical Class Action
Aetna Life Insurance
Houston Woman Denied $426,000
Student Loan Xpress Settles Class Action with Students
Student Loan Xpress Settles Class Action with Students
FDA Issues Update on Safety Review Orlistat
Orlistat FDA Issues Update on Safety Review
The Princeton Reivew
Personal Data Made Public on Tens of Thousands of Florida Students
Xigris
Study Prompts FDA Safety Review

Court turns away suit over Confederate flag shirts
"Court turns away suit over Confederate flag shirts"
Tenn. teen battles schools Confederate flag ban
Florida Republican Wants Confederate Flag License Plate
6th Cir. Judges support Tenn. schools Confederate flag ban
Confederate Flag Hysteria Grips Bloomington Minnesota High School Officials









