Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Patent Law Blogs -> IPBiz
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Patent Law
: IPBizTim Lee on Menell on patent lawyers
By Lawrence B. Ebert, Esq.
If I'm right that, as I argued on Friday, there's a cultural gap between the patent bar and the technology industry on the subject of software patents, an interesting question is how we got them in the first place. After all, it wasn't that long ago that software was widely believed to be unpatentable, and major technology firms were hardly clamoring for patent protection. Peter Mennell, a Berkeley law professor who spoke at last Wednesday's Brookings patent conference had an interesting perspective on how this came about. He argues that the impetus for software patents came from patent attorneys within major software firms who spread the "gospel of patenting" within their companies. Not surprisingly, CEOs tend to delegate patent issues to their patent lawyers, and of course patent lawyers will tend to have more pro-patent views than their bosses. And so despite the fact that few technology executives were enthusiastic about patenting, the patent lawyers who worked for them pushed their firms in that direction. And of course, once some software firms started acquiring significant numbers of patents, it sparked the arms race that we've talked about here at Techdirt.
The line --of course patent lawyers will tend to have more pro-patent views than their bosses-- surprised LBE. Registered patent attorneys tend to be more realistic about patentability than "bosses." Back during the time of the Unocal patent, LBE noted the manager responding to a patent attorney: well, patent the damned thing anyway. [See IPT]
LBE once heard Menell speak at Temple, where Menell launched into the "transistor only for hearing aids" Lemley-ism.
See also:
http://ipbiz.blogspot.com/2008/06/timothy-lee-blasts-federal-circuit.html
http://ipbiz.blogspot.com/2007/06/tim-lee-piece-in-ny-times-on-microsoft.html
Full post as published by IPBiz on January 19, 2009 (boomark / email).
Zantac Patent
GlaxoSmithKline and Cypress Pharmaceutical settle patent infringement dispute.
Soliris Patent
Alexion Pharmaceuticals Inc. agrees to pay the Oklahoma Medical Research Foundation a $10 million patent infringement settlement.
Kentucky lawyers
fraud case ends in mistrial.
DRAM Patent
ProMOS Technologies and Mosel Vitelic pay MOSAID Technologies an undisclosed patent infringement settlement.
Financial Elder Abuse - Financial Exploitation, Elder Abuse Lawyers
Financial Elder Abuse alleging seniors are taken advantage of for their finances.
Sony
to Pay $18.5 Million For Patent Infringment

Patent Lawyers Do the Boogie as Court Shoots Down PTO Rules
Vigilant vendors keep an eye on costs charged by foreign patent agents








