ADVERTISEMENT



Google       

Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Law Humor Blogs -> Lowering the Bar

OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense

Find a Local Lawyer

Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402

Bookmark

Law Humor

: Lowering the Bar

Bear Forced to Wear Wire in Custody Battle

By Kevin Underhill

ADVERTISEMENTS

It's bad enough that our government is now routinely spying on us.  Now you can't even trust stuffed animals.

Last week, a Nebraska man sued his ex-wife, her father, and the woman's former law firm for allegedly hiding a recording device inside his four-year-old daughter's teddy bear in order to gather evidence to use in a custody battle.  William Lewton, his daughter, "and five other plaintiffs who were recorded by the bear" are seeking damages for invasion of privacy and wiretapping.

According to the lawsuit, Dianna Divingnzzo had been awarded sole custody of the girl after the couple 921-i_love_you_teddy_bear divorced, although it looks to me like Lewton got to keep about half of the vowels in her last name.  Not content with that, Lewton was apparently seeking custody rights, and so I gather the bear was recruited to gather evidence during his visitations.  Lewton's attorney said this week that it's believed the bear recorded "several hundred hours" of conversations between Christmas 2007 and May 2008.

The recordings were discovered in June when Lewton's attorney was given copies of them by Divingnzzo's attorneys.  The latter contend, however, that they knew nothing about the bear being wired until their client presented them with the recordings.  "We had nothing to do with [the ursine subterfuge]," said one of the attorneys representing the woman.  "We did not advise her to do so."

The lawsuit follows a state court's ruling last summer in the custody case that the recording was a violation of Nebraska's wiretapping law, so the bear's intelligence was not admissible.

Link: AP via Findlaw.com

Full post as published by Lowering the Bar on January 08, 2009 (boomark / email).

Bloggers, promote your law blog by nominating your blog for inclusion in USLaw.com's Law Blog Directory and RSS Reader. Benefits described.
Related Law Articles

Lawsuits and Settlements

Related Searches

























































































































US Law
#1 Online Legal Resource













Your Blog Subscriptions
Subscribe to blogs

10,000+ Law Job Listings
Lawyer . Police . Paralegal . Etc
Earn a law-related degree
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.


Practice Area
Zip Code:

Contact a Lawyer Now!






0.0131 secs (new cache)