ADVERTISEMENT



Google       

Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Labor & Employment Law Blogs -> New York Public Personnel Law

OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense

Find a Local Lawyer

Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402

Bookmark

Labor & Employment Law

: New York Public Personnel Law

FMLA rights lost when employee failed to fill-out employer?s ?change of address? form

ADVERTISEMENTS

FMLA rights lost when employee failed to fill-out employer?s ?change of address? form

Source: The FMLA Blog - http://federalfmla.typepad.com/fmla_blog/ Copyright © 2009. All rights reserved by Carl C. Bosland, Esq. Reproduced with permission. Mr. Bosland is the author of A Federal Sector Guide to the Family and Medical Leave Act & Related Litigation.

Sconfienza v. Verizon Pennsylvania, Inc., No. 07-2498, 2008 U.S. App. LEXIS 24740 (3d Cir. Dec. 5, 2005), company policy required an employee to submit a personal certification attesting that each absence was related to a previously approved need for intermittent FMLA leave. In so doing, the employee gained FMLA protections for absences that were personally certified. An employee who failed to submit such personal certification could be cited with a chargeable absence for purposes of discipline, even if the absence was, in fact, for the same FMLA-covered condition.

Sconfienza was pre-approved for intermittent FMLA leave due to migraines. She failed, however, to submit personal certifications for a number of absences, which resulted in her receiving discipline. Sconfienza sued, alleging that the discipline violated her FMLA rights. She sought to excuse her failure to submit personal certifications for the cited absences based on Verizon's failure to send the certification forms to the appropriate address. Verizon countered that, under company policy, Sconfienza was required to change her official address of record, and that she had repeatedly refused to do so.

The burden was on Sconfienza, the Third Circuit found, to ensure that she complied with Verizon's known personal certification leave procedures. Because she did not file the appropriate personal certifications, she was not entitled to FMLA leave.

Mr. Bosland Comments: To gain FMLA protections an employee must comply with their employer's known usual and customary leave reporting requirements. Employees refusing to abide by those requirements, perhaps out of frustration, may inadvertently deprive themselves of FMLA protections. All employees might consider heeding a bit of wisdom from the collective bargaining world: obey now, grieve later.

Full post as published by New York Public Personnel Law on January 06, 2009 (boomark / email).

Bloggers, promote your law blog by nominating your blog for inclusion in USLaw.com's Law Blog Directory and RSS Reader. Benefits described.
Related Law Articles

Lawsuits and Settlements

Related Searches

























































































































US Law
#1 Online Legal Resource













Your Blog Subscriptions
Subscribe to blogs

10,000+ Law Job Listings
Lawyer . Police . Paralegal . Etc
Earn a law-related degree
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.


Practice Area
Zip Code:

Contact a Lawyer Now!






0.0022 secs (from cache 10/31/26 19:04:27)